Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Freedom (Fraser Institute and Heritage Foundation)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This rating suits the findings of objective indicators where Sweden has the highest Gross Domestic Product [ 73 ], the lowest income inequality [ 74 ] and highest justice index [ 75 ] of the countries under study. Also, the Freedom Index, an objective rating of freedom, of Sweden is high in comparison to other countries, but not as high Spain, U.K. and U.S.A. in the present country sample [ 76 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This rating suits the findings of objective indicators where Sweden has the highest Gross Domestic Product [ 73 ], the lowest income inequality [ 74 ] and highest justice index [ 75 ] of the countries under study. Also, the Freedom Index, an objective rating of freedom, of Sweden is high in comparison to other countries, but not as high Spain, U.K. and U.S.A. in the present country sample [ 76 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results correspond not only to higher symptom levels reported in Eastern and Southern European countries in the present study, but also to the lower ratings of subjective macro-level factors. Objective measures of macro-level factors reflect a low Gross Domestic Product in Poland, Russia and Spain [ 73 ], high income inequality and low objective ratings of justice in France, Poland, Russia and Spain [ 74 , 75 ] and low ratings of freedom in Poland and Russia [ 76 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Institutional quality epitomizes economic freedom grounded on 12 quantitative and qualitative factors such as property rights, judicial effectiveness, government integrity, tax burden, government spending, fiscal health, business freedom, labor freedom, monetary freedom, trade freedom, investment freedom, and financial freedom. According to HEFI, institutional qualities are divided into four main pillars, namely rule of law (property rights, judicial effectiveness, and government integrity), government size (tax burden, government spending, and fiscal health), regulatory efficiency (business freedom, labor freedom, and monetary freedom) and market openness with three indicators; trade freedom, investment freedom, and financial freedom[ 13 , 14 , 99 ]. Both sources of data employed in this study are dependable data sources and thus data used in this study are highly reliable.…”
Section: Methodology Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ekonomik özgürlüğün, üzerinde konsensus sağlanmış net bir tanımlaması olmamakla birlikte (Erdal, 2004), bireylerin ekonomik faaliyetlerini hür iradeleri kapsamında gerçekleştirebilmesi, bireylerin sahip oldukları mülkiyetlerini kontrol edebilmeleri ve üzerinde tasarruf yetkisine haiz olabilme hakları olarak ifade edilebilir (Beach ve Miles, 2004;Mushtaq ve Khan, 2018;Heritage, 2022). Bu bağlamda bireylerin hayatlarını idame ettirdiği ekosistemde ilgili piyasa ve düzenleyici aktörlerin emek ve sermaye hareketleri için çizdiği özgürlük çerçevesinde üretim, tüketim ve ticaret faaliyetlerinin gerçekleştirilmesi, paylaşılması veya devredilebilmesi ekonomik özgürlük için önemli kabul edilir (Vukotic ve Baćović, 2006;McMahon, 2014;Brkic, 2020). Bireylerin ekonomik özgürlüğü, baskı, istila, dolandırıcılık veya hırsızlık gibi gayri ahlaki ve etik davranışlarla elde edilen mülkler üzerindeki kullanım, takas veya hibe haklarını ifade etmekten uzaktır (Gwartney ve Lawson, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified