2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.03.1612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Impact Of A 13-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccination Programme In A Mexican Corporate Setting

Abstract: A277plasty-compared to non-infected patients-ranged from 5.4 to 54 days. Differences in populations and outcome measures in studies evaluating mortality, readmissions and costs due to SSIs associated with hip arthroplasty precluded group analysis. A representative example of results from one US study reported the average total charges (in 2006 US$) of treating SSIs in patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty to be $73,452 compared to $38,588 to treat non-infected patients. In addition, a UK study … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most commonly captured benefit from the broad perspective was outcome-related productivity gains. Sixteen studies (10.7%) included this benefit [ 74 76 , 81 , 85 , 87 , 98 , 108 , 115 , 117 , 127 , 132 , 142 , 144 , 157 , 165 ]. These studies estimated how much work individuals miss due to a case of pneumococcal disease and compute the value of that missed work by multiplying missed time by the wage rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The most commonly captured benefit from the broad perspective was outcome-related productivity gains. Sixteen studies (10.7%) included this benefit [ 74 76 , 81 , 85 , 87 , 98 , 108 , 115 , 117 , 127 , 132 , 142 , 144 , 157 , 165 ]. These studies estimated how much work individuals miss due to a case of pneumococcal disease and compute the value of that missed work by multiplying missed time by the wage rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even within the literature that examines benefits other than our narrow ones, study quality and reporting are at times limited. For example, of the 17 unique studies that account for at least one broad benefit, seven (41.2%) present only study abstracts [ 75 , 81 , 85 , 87 , 98 , 115 , 144 ]. Of the remaining 10 studies [ 74 , 76 , 108 , 117 , 127 , 132 , 142 , 157 , 160 , 165 ], other limitations abound, including, for example, borrowing epidemiological trend data from other countries [ 108 ], lack of data necessitating many assumptions and low estimate precision [ 157 ], and possible confounding due to a study’s observational nature [ 160 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations