1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1996.00272.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Impacts of AAG Conferences∗

Abstract: This paper estimates various economic impacts of the annual conferences of the Association of American Geographers (AAG) on the states in which they have been held, from 1983 to 1994. It uses data on the number of registrants at these conferences, the average expenditures and durations of stay of these individuals, and the sectoral distribution of these expenditures. Input‐output analysis was employed to estimate the indirect and induced impacts on each state or province. Aggregate expenditures ranged from $89… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are many positives associated with attendance at meetings such as that of the AAG-ranging from the educational to the social and professional (although these, too, need to be critically scrutinized; see Høyer and Naess 2001)-my implicit assumption herein is that, in the case of gatherings that require, facilitate, or encourage flying, it is highly questionable that the resulting many-fold good compensates for the resulting harm. Clearly this is a debatable matter and depends on, among other factors, one's concerns and how one frames "the good" derived from the holding of meetings such as the annual AAG gathering (see, e.g., Randall and Warf 1996). What is not debatable is that relatively sustainable alternatives to jet travel-related means of communication and collaboration exist (see Monbiot 2007;Pedelty 2008;McKibben 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are many positives associated with attendance at meetings such as that of the AAG-ranging from the educational to the social and professional (although these, too, need to be critically scrutinized; see Høyer and Naess 2001)-my implicit assumption herein is that, in the case of gatherings that require, facilitate, or encourage flying, it is highly questionable that the resulting many-fold good compensates for the resulting harm. Clearly this is a debatable matter and depends on, among other factors, one's concerns and how one frames "the good" derived from the holding of meetings such as the annual AAG gathering (see, e.g., Randall and Warf 1996). What is not debatable is that relatively sustainable alternatives to jet travel-related means of communication and collaboration exist (see Monbiot 2007;Pedelty 2008;McKibben 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input‐output model is a popular tool to determine the size of the multiplier and the impact of visitor spending on the economy of a country (see Kottke 1988; Zhou et al. 1997; Randall and Warf 1996; Saayman et al. 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al 2010), economic impacts (e.g. Grado et al 1997;Randall and Warf 1996), destination marketing (e.g. Simerly 1990; Davidson and Rogers 2006), the meeting participation process (e.g.…”
Section: Field Configuration or Reproduction?mentioning
confidence: 99%