2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-005-0027-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic impacts of Pink Hibiscus Mealybug in Florida and the United States

Abstract: This paper estimates the expected annual impacts of the Pink Hibiscus Mealybug infestation on the economies of Florida and the rest of the United States. The approach involves a Markov chain analysis wherein both short run and long run expected damages from infestation are calculated. Use is made of the CLIMEX model that predicts the potential pest-establishment regions in the US. While predictions based upon the CLIMEX model extend the scope of damages beyond Florida, the damages are significantly dependent u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As well as wind, water, bed-soil, humans, and domestic and wild animals may aid the passive dispersal of mealybugs (Kosztarab and Kozár 1988). Among arthropods, ants have also been reported to disperse some mealybug species (Gullan and Kosztarab 1997;Malsch et al 2001;Ranjan 2006). Nevertheless, if conditions are favorable, crawlers usually settle on the natal host plant, often close to their mother, which leads to an aggregative distribution (Gullan and Kosztarab 1997;Nestel et al 1995).…”
Section: Dispersalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well as wind, water, bed-soil, humans, and domestic and wild animals may aid the passive dispersal of mealybugs (Kosztarab and Kozár 1988). Among arthropods, ants have also been reported to disperse some mealybug species (Gullan and Kosztarab 1997;Malsch et al 2001;Ranjan 2006). Nevertheless, if conditions are favorable, crawlers usually settle on the natal host plant, often close to their mother, which leads to an aggregative distribution (Gullan and Kosztarab 1997;Nestel et al 1995).…”
Section: Dispersalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Economic costs can be direct, involving exclusion, eradication, control, and mitigation; or indirect, involving human health or alteration of communities and ecosystems (Perrings et al 2005, McNeely 2001a). Indirect economic costs, which include ecosystem services (Charles and Dukes 2007), are more difficult to calculate, often are not considered, and can overwhelm direct costs (Ranjan 2006). Seldom considered are both the economic and environmental costs of using pesticides to control (or manage) immigrant pests.…”
Section: Detrimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La presencia de una plaga puede causar fuertes impactos económicos directos o indirectos. Los impactos directos incluyen los costos de prevención, control, monitoreo y daños a las especies hospederas, mientras que los impactos indirectos incluyen pérdidas económicas ocasionadas por las cuarentenas, pérdidas en el comercio debido a interrupciones en el abastecimiento y las barreras comerciales que restringen las exportaciones para evitar la introducción y esparcimiento de la plaga (Ranjan 2006). La presencia de la CRH en los cultivos de mango en el estado de Nayarit puede causar un fuerte impacto econó-mico directo, ya que la mayor incidencia de la plaga se observó en el cultivar Ataulfo, que son árboles semi-vigorosos, muy productivos y poco alternantes, cuya época de producción ocurre de mayo a julio (Chávez-Contreras et al 2001).…”
Section: Materials Y Métodosunclassified