Economic inequalities and discontent in European cities

Abstract

This paper reconsiders a stylized fact of the literature on the relationship between urbanization and subjective well-being, the urban well-being paradox, i.e., the densest settings typically show the highest level of individual discontent. By drawing on an original sample based on more 50,000 individuals in 83 cities of the 27 member states of the European Union plus the UK, the paper highlights three main results. First, bigger cities are characterized by intrinsically higher inequalities than smaller ones, suggesting a scaling of disparities: interpersonal inequalities represent an often-overlooked cause of urbanization diseconomies. Second, compositional effects on discontent are particularly detrimental in cities, suggesting a scaling of discontent. Moreover, compositional and contextual characteristics mix in cities, amplifying the negative effect of inequalities especially for the most fragile social groups. Third, discontent with life and discontent with specific domains of city life do not always go in tandem. Nevertheless, the advantages of largest cities seem especially a benefit for élite individuals.

Intra-urban house prices in Madrid following the financial crisis: an exploration of spatial inequality

“…Madrid is a major European city, financial and cultural centre. Large cities have structurally higher inequalities than smaller ones, due to the varied affluence of the population 43 . Madrid's housing market has a monocentric structure, characterised by very high house prices in the city centre (Supplementary Fig.…”

Assessing Quality of Life and Walkability for Urban Regeneration: The Piave Neighbourhood in Mestre-Venice

“…The phase of expansive growth has given way to a new phase in which the issue of regeneration is paramount [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. The nature of the concept of urban and territorial regeneration is considered an action aimed at transforming the tangible and intangible components of cities and territories, based on a reading of the urban phenomenon as a complex interweaving of spatial and socioeconomic aspects [11][12][13][14]. The concept of urban regeneration encompasses more than just renewal activities.…”

“…This link is the first of five overarching themes that Roberts identifies as the primary objectives of urban regeneration. The assessment should take into account both the tangible and intangible aspects of the urban area [13,[15][16][17]30].…”

Smart cities and the urban digital divide

“…9 shows that low-income brackets within populations, and minorities, in countries characterized by different institutional economic contexts such as UAE, Mexico, and Northern Ireland are exposed to greater risk of energy poverty and access to intra-urban transport; along the same lines, ref. 10 documents substantial urban-rural differences in quality of life, with a particularly relevant divide characterizing within-cities inequalities.…”