2017
DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2016.2574758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Model Predictive Control and Applications for Diesel Generators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the constraint tightening (CT) approach, in which the constraints are systematically tightened and a margin is reserved along the horizon to correct for errors due to uncertainties [18], does not incur additional computational load when compared to the conventional MPC. In [19], a CT-MPC formulation is proposed for diesel generators in power tracking applications. In both [17] and [19], the number of tuning parameters remain the same as in conventional MPC, requiring a significant effort to achieve the desired output time domain characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the constraint tightening (CT) approach, in which the constraints are systematically tightened and a margin is reserved along the horizon to correct for errors due to uncertainties [18], does not incur additional computational load when compared to the conventional MPC. In [19], a CT-MPC formulation is proposed for diesel generators in power tracking applications. In both [17] and [19], the number of tuning parameters remain the same as in conventional MPC, requiring a significant effort to achieve the desired output time domain characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [19], a CT-MPC formulation is proposed for diesel generators in power tracking applications. In both [17] and [19], the number of tuning parameters remain the same as in conventional MPC, requiring a significant effort to achieve the desired output time domain characteristics. Furthermore, as in [20], it might be infeasible to provide robustness guarantees with a large disturbance set because of lack of control authority to reject the disturbances by the end of the horizon in robust MPC formulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, speed and load of the marine main engine are strongly affected by numerous other external aspects, such as the weather in the sea and the surface condition of the sea [2,8]. Attempts have been made on the basis of variable control method, such as conventional PID method [9], sliding mode control (SMC) [2], ∞ control [10], 2 Mathematical Problems in Engineering active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) [11], fuzzy control [5], and model predictive control (MPC) [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, ∞ control and MPC techniques not only rely on exact mathematical model, but also require high-performance processor to execute the complex matrix computation. As shown in [12], the MPC method was carried out with the help of two 900-MHz IMB PPC processors, which actually cannot be accepted commercially. Despite the fact that there exists computationally efficient MPC algorithm with online linearization and quadratic optimization (e.g., [13][14][15]), where the online computational requirement is acceptable, such computational simplicity is generally realized by sacrificing the control performance as the linear approximation is invalid when the system state and input deviate far away from where they are linearized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These days the heating systems which use several low-power boilers are more popular than using only a single boiler (Broomhead et al, 2017). This article describes a heating system that is used in one particular private home sector in Latvia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%