2017
DOI: 10.1071/sr16284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic perspectives on nitrogen in farming systems: managing trade-offs between production, risk and the environment

Abstract: Economic insights are crucial for making sound decisions about farm-level management of nitrogen and also about regional or national policy such as for water pollution. In the present review, key insights are presented from a large and diverse literature on the economics of nitrogen in agriculture and the economics of the consequences of nitrogen fertilisation. Issues covered include (1) the economics of nitrogen as an input to production, (2) nitrogen and economic risk at the farm level, (3) the economics of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nitrogen (N) fertilizer inputs are crucial for achieving high crop yields, but the loss of reactive N from agricultural systems leads to atmospheric, surface water, and groundwater pollution [1][2][3], ultimately diminishing environmental quality and human well-being [4,5]. Despite the potential environmental consequences to society, the pressure on producers to increase productivity oftentimes leads to N fertilizer applications in excess of crop requirement [6,7]. Without more efficient N fertilizer applications, the increasing global population and subsequent rising demand for food are expected to cause an increase in the loss of reactive N in the future [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrogen (N) fertilizer inputs are crucial for achieving high crop yields, but the loss of reactive N from agricultural systems leads to atmospheric, surface water, and groundwater pollution [1][2][3], ultimately diminishing environmental quality and human well-being [4,5]. Despite the potential environmental consequences to society, the pressure on producers to increase productivity oftentimes leads to N fertilizer applications in excess of crop requirement [6,7]. Without more efficient N fertilizer applications, the increasing global population and subsequent rising demand for food are expected to cause an increase in the loss of reactive N in the future [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRTN rates are ~10% higher than those reported in the ARMS survey and range from 129 to 209 kg N ha −1 yr −1 (Table 2), for an average rate of 177 (±27 SD) kg N ha −1 yr −1 . Farmers in general 17 and U.S. farmers specifically 32 more often use N fertilizer recommendations from fertilizer and seed dealers than from university extension, and when used, MRTN rates are commonly used as starting points for N rate decisions. We thus set our maximum range to 20% greater than local MRTN values to obtain a plausible bracketing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pressure on farmers to increase crop yields for greater economic return often leads to excessive N fertilizer application, despite its economic and environmental cost 1,1719 . In most of the world, fertilizer is applied uniformly at the beginning of a cropping season in anticipation of high yields and efficient use, even though farmers recognize that yields and N use will be neither uniform nor necessarily efficient in any given year, and that fertilizer not taken up by crops will be lost from fields, thereby lowering profits and harming the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if it is used excessively in such cases, it can pollute rivers and streams, as well as cause greenhouse gas emissions. As a result, excessive deployment, wastes resources and money while also exacerbating environmental problems 11 . Fertilizers, with a energy equivalency of 51.5 percent, were found to have the highest rate of energy equivalency among all the inputs used in maize production 12 Planting window is one of the non-monetary input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%