1993
DOI: 10.14217/9781848594982-en
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Policies in Small Open Economies

Abstract: The Commonwealth Secretariat has long had a significant programme of activities for the benefit of small states. These countries are increasingly concerned about the possibility of further marginalisation of their economies as a result of the rapid changes that are taking place in the world economy. Recognising these developments, Commonwealth Heads of Government, at their 1989 Kuala Lumpur meeting, asked the Secretariat to give priority to small states in its economic work. This directive was reiterated at th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MoFMRA countered this proposition believing that protectionist measures will not stimulate local production but instead will result in product shortages and inflated prices. As noted by Worrell (1992) and Briguglio (1995) in their reference to import substitution policies in small island nations, expectations of filling supply gaps with locally produced goods from a limited resource base are unrealistic due to inherent inefficiencies in production and diseconomies of scale. The study notes the possibility that those benefitting from controlling food import flows would likely be food traders who could act quickly in exploiting price differential for profit.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MoFMRA countered this proposition believing that protectionist measures will not stimulate local production but instead will result in product shortages and inflated prices. As noted by Worrell (1992) and Briguglio (1995) in their reference to import substitution policies in small island nations, expectations of filling supply gaps with locally produced goods from a limited resource base are unrealistic due to inherent inefficiencies in production and diseconomies of scale. The study notes the possibility that those benefitting from controlling food import flows would likely be food traders who could act quickly in exploiting price differential for profit.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes the economy highly dependent on foreign exchange earnings. In addition, the small size of the domestic market severely limits import substitution possibilities (Worrell, 1992, pp. 9-10).…”
Section: The Size Of Countries: Economic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%