Public Policy in Britain 1994
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-23444-8_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Policy under the Conservatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inflation was running at 10 per cent when the Tories come to power (Jackson 1992, 25). This rose sharply (1980–81) to a peak of around 20 per cent (Brittan 1989, 20; Dunn and Smith 1994, 79; Hay 2009)—a product, arguably, of the monetarist conversion in policy failing to bite immediately and of the abandoning of Labour's policies on wage restraint (Thompson 1996, 169). The rise in inflation was, in effect, a consequence of the rapidity of the paradigm shift.…”
Section: Thatcherite Influence In Specific Policy Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inflation was running at 10 per cent when the Tories come to power (Jackson 1992, 25). This rose sharply (1980–81) to a peak of around 20 per cent (Brittan 1989, 20; Dunn and Smith 1994, 79; Hay 2009)—a product, arguably, of the monetarist conversion in policy failing to bite immediately and of the abandoning of Labour's policies on wage restraint (Thompson 1996, 169). The rise in inflation was, in effect, a consequence of the rapidity of the paradigm shift.…”
Section: Thatcherite Influence In Specific Policy Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the ratio of household debt to disposable income increased dramatically: having remained 'steady at 40-50 per cent in the 1970s and early 1980s, [it] rose from about 45 per cent in 1982 to just over 50 per cent in 1984, and then to over 90 per cent in 1990'. 5 Throughout the 1990s and early 2000s this trend only continued, so that the United Kingdom had experienced the largest increase amongst developed economies in total debt relative to GDP between 2000 and 2008, with its ratio reaching 469 per cent, and comprising a 52 per cent increase in household debt. The marketisation of welfare provision, coupled with rising living standards for sections of the core electorate, mitigated the effects of an overall intensification of labour and the increasingly precarious nature of full and part-time employment.…”
Section: Dismantling Social Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%