1989
DOI: 10.1080/0268093890040509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic rationalism and the politics of education in Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Australia there is a similar mix of philosophical positions in the educational policies of the two major parties as evidenced by the similarities between the reforms of the Labor government of WA in 1984 (Birch and Smart, 1989) and those of the Liberals in NSW in 1989. Thus a change in government does not imply a departure from a policy of economic rationalism.…”
Section: The Nsw Crisis In the Wider Contextmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In Australia there is a similar mix of philosophical positions in the educational policies of the two major parties as evidenced by the similarities between the reforms of the Labor government of WA in 1984 (Birch and Smart, 1989) and those of the Liberals in NSW in 1989. Thus a change in government does not imply a departure from a policy of economic rationalism.…”
Section: The Nsw Crisis In the Wider Contextmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Much will therefore depend on the acceptance of the services provided by the Downloaded by [University of Birmingham] at 06:20 17 November 2014 AEC-sponsored agency whose emergence is now to be examined. What is no longer questioned, in these times of economic rationalism (Birch and Smart 1989), is that the Commonwealth has acquired partnership status, at the very least, in national curriculum policymaking.…”
Section: The Second Coming and Going Of The Cdcmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This turn was epitomised in an extension of the responsibilities of the Department of Education to accommodate those of employment and training, with employment taking precedence in the title of this mega-ministry, the Department of Employment, Education and Training (DEET) a sure indicator of its importance in the mega-ministry (Birch & Smart, 1989), particularly in a context of rising unemployment. Many of the agencies formerly associated with the superseded ministry and which were responsible for fostering practices in Australian education in the previous decade, like the Curriculum Development Council, were also dissolved.…”
Section: Post-fordist Education: An Australian Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%