1984
DOI: 10.1016/0090-5720(84)90005-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic self-interest and other motivational factors underlying charitable giving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, social exchange theory would suggest that materialistic people donate to receive some gratification, pleasure, satisfaction (Thibaut and Kelley 1959), or some form of social power (Homans 1958;Emerson 1976), which is consistent with the argument that ''charitable contributions may be motivated by givers' self-interest'' (Mathur 1996, p. 108;Pitt and Skelly 1984). In examining charitable giving for older adults, Mathur (1996) proposes individuals would engage in charitable activities when the outcome or benefit of that activity is at least equal to the cost of the activity.…”
Section: Relationship Between Materialism and Charitable Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Specifically, social exchange theory would suggest that materialistic people donate to receive some gratification, pleasure, satisfaction (Thibaut and Kelley 1959), or some form of social power (Homans 1958;Emerson 1976), which is consistent with the argument that ''charitable contributions may be motivated by givers' self-interest'' (Mathur 1996, p. 108;Pitt and Skelly 1984). In examining charitable giving for older adults, Mathur (1996) proposes individuals would engage in charitable activities when the outcome or benefit of that activity is at least equal to the cost of the activity.…”
Section: Relationship Between Materialism and Charitable Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…An exception to this pattern is reported by Pitts and Skelly (1984). However, differences between volunteers and non-volunteers often vanish in multiple regression analyses controlling for joint determinants of giving and volunteering (Bekkers 2002;Wiepking & Maas 2006).…”
Section: Volunteeringmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Survey studies have consistently found a negative relation between the size of congregations and religious contributions (Davidson & Pyle 1994;Hungerman 2005;Olson & Caddell 1994;Stonebraker 2003;. While donors often deny the importance of social pressure (Polonsky et al 2002), survey studies have found that donations are rather strongly related to measures of social pressure (Bekkers & Schuyt 2005;Mathur 1996;Pitts & Skelly 1984;Smith & McSweeney 2007).…”
Section: Reputationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examining donations to a local United Way, Pitts and Skelly (1984) found that single people were less likely to donate and donate lower amounts than those who were married. Regnerus et al (1998) found that married people in the US were more likely to give to organisations supporting the poor and the needy.…”
Section: Types Of Organisationsmentioning
confidence: 99%