2018
DOI: 10.1177/1932296818769098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Value of Improved Accuracy for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Devices for Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes in England

Abstract: Investment in devices with higher strip prices but improved accuracy (less error) appears to be an efficient strategy for insulin-treated diabetes patients at high risk of severe hypoglycemia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the lifetime analysis, we extrapolated the findings from ASK and routine screening over the projected lifetime of patients using an adaptation from a previously published Markov simulation model (Excel 2016; Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA) (28,29). The Markov simulation model estimates long-run clinical and economic outcomes for the average patient with type 1 diabetes (Supplementary Material).…”
Section: Lifetime Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the lifetime analysis, we extrapolated the findings from ASK and routine screening over the projected lifetime of patients using an adaptation from a previously published Markov simulation model (Excel 2016; Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA) (28,29). The Markov simulation model estimates long-run clinical and economic outcomes for the average patient with type 1 diabetes (Supplementary Material).…”
Section: Lifetime Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These costs involve direct costs for acute MI, direct costs for follow-up (first year), and direct costs for successfully treated MI. Latest available data for these diabetes-related costs were retrieved from the following references: France, [21][22][23][24] Germany, 25,26 Italy, [27][28][29] Spain, [30][31][32][33][34][35][36] and the United Kingdom [37][38][39][40][41][42][43] (summarized in Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…National and international publications provided the current values of expenditures for both fatal and nonfatal MI events. 20,22,23,28,31,32,38,39,42,43 According to fatal MI events in the diabetic population, fatal MI events were estimated for insulin-treated patients. Costs for fatal and nonfatal MI events were calculated as acute treatment costs and successfully treated (acute treatment costs summed with the first-year follow-up costs).…”
Section: Myocardial Infarctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,27 Average cost for hypoglycemia included costs for hospitalized and ambulant treated patients. [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] The percentage of hospitalized patients were multiplied by the average costs of hospitalization and summed with percentage of ambulance-treated patients multiplied by average ambulance costs. UKPDS Risk Engine (55).…”
Section: No Tests Day X Price Of Strip X Price Of Lancet Days Price Gmmentioning
confidence: 99%