2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic viability of utilizing biomass energy from young stands—The case of Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore energy wood thinning in young stands has been subsidized by the government since the late 1990s and this so called Kemera fund enables the harvesting activities in young stands in Finland (Tanttu and Sirén 2004, Heikkilä et al 2007, Ahtikoski et al 2008. State subsidies for logging are 7 € m -3 and for chipping 4.25 € m -3 (Kemera opas 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore energy wood thinning in young stands has been subsidized by the government since the late 1990s and this so called Kemera fund enables the harvesting activities in young stands in Finland (Tanttu and Sirén 2004, Heikkilä et al 2007, Ahtikoski et al 2008. State subsidies for logging are 7 € m -3 and for chipping 4.25 € m -3 (Kemera opas 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observation-based range of 3-8 TgN yr −1 in the magnitude of these emissions could result in a 10 % difference in predicted tropospheric ozone burden. OAT sensitivity analysis is used in a variety of research fields including environmental science (Bailis et al, 2005;Campbell et al, 2008;de Gee et al, 2008;Saltelli and Annoni, 2010), medicine (Coggan et al, 2005;Stites et al, 2007;Wu et al, 2013), economics (Ahtikoski et al, 2008) and physics (Hill et al, 2012). While the ease of implementing OAT sensitivity analysis is appealing, a major drawback of this approach is that it assumes that the model response to different inputs is independent, which in most cases is unjustified (Saltelli and Annoni, 2010) and can result in biased results .…”
Section: Different Approaches For Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, environmental concerns, responding to human induced global warming, have recently lead to the realisation that the utilisation of other tangible and intangible forestry services must also be included as additional forest management objectives. As a response, exploring the potential of energy biomass production and how to integrate its production in forest management practices is getting much attention at present (Hoen and Solberg 1994, Ahtikoski et al 2008, Kärkkäinen et al 2008, Heikkilä et al 2009). Current forest management practices aiming mainly at timber production may not necessarily be appropriate as such for the integrated production of energy biomass and timber and also for increasing the carbon sequestration and stocks in the forest ecosystem.…”
Section: Energy Biomass Production and Utilisationmentioning
confidence: 99%