2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economics of electric energy storage for energy arbitrage and regulation in New York

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
212
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 421 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
212
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several reasons this may not be correct, including use of coal and oil generators for compensation and interaction between renewable variability and load variability (8), so the estimates in Table 2 are likely to provide an upper bound on estimates of the emissions increase associated with wind and solar generation's variability. Storage systems other than pumped hydroelectric are presently not cost-effective (27), but may reduce the need for ramping generators should their costs fall.…”
Section: Interactions Between Rpss and Cairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several reasons this may not be correct, including use of coal and oil generators for compensation and interaction between renewable variability and load variability (8), so the estimates in Table 2 are likely to provide an upper bound on estimates of the emissions increase associated with wind and solar generation's variability. Storage systems other than pumped hydroelectric are presently not cost-effective (27), but may reduce the need for ramping generators should their costs fall.…”
Section: Interactions Between Rpss and Cairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar result was found for isolated power systems (Mercier et al, 2009). The value of electrical energy storage for the purposes of energy arbitrage, frequency regulation and network reinforcement deferral was calculated for the New York system by Walawalkar et al (2007). The authors concluded that sodium-sulphur (NaS) and flywheel units had a high probability of a positive net-present value in the New York City region for energy arbitrage and frequency regulation.…”
Section: Introduction To Energy Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large share of the existing PBUC work assumes perfect foresight of future prices and the storage plant to be small enough to be a price-taker in the considered market (e.g., [18][19][20][21][22][23]). Although quite some studies discuss a relaxation of the perfect price foresight assumption (e.g., [16,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30]), less attention has been given to the relaxation of the price-taking assumption in PBUC arbitrage models. However, either large-scale or multiple small-scale storage plants that are operated cooperatively could benefit from considering the price-effect of (dis)charge actions.…”
Section: Scope and Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%