Economics of gender: A bibliometric analysis

Abstract

This research aims to identify major fields and structures of economics of gender research based on bibliometric analysis between 1960 and 2020. The analysis of the journals in economics of gender captures major development stages of gender economics. The study of economics of gender is growing rapidly as seen in the increasing number of journals, articles and citations from the 1970s onwards. It grew faster than the pace of economic publications during the 1980–1990s. The economics of gender research disciplines largely replicates economics and can be viewed as part of economics of inequality. But its feminist philosophy and methodology distinguish the economics of gender as a separate branch of economic sciences which furnishes new findings. According to the Scimago and Web of Science databases, more than 90% of articles in economics of gender are published in English (fewer than in the field of economics in general). The structure of the analyzed countries reflects not only the sophistication of national research in economics of gender, but also the degree of their integration into international scientific discourse, including the presence of a language barrier. Gender economists are primarily focused on the problems of developing countries. Advanced economies account for less than a third of all publications.

Text as Data in Demography: Russian-language experience

“…The first three topics concern the reproductive attitudes, the last three topics concern the opinion on demographic policy on fertility side (see more Refs. [62,63]).…”

Gender inequality in Russia: Axial institutions and agency

“…Gender economic studies and global gender indexes are primarily focused on labor market inequalities and particularly gender wage gaps (Kalabikhina and Rebrey, 2022b). Comparing female and male activity, efficiency, education, experience, and personal qualities, studies conclude that the level of gender inequality is determined by gender stereotypes (Berniell et al, 2021;Morsy, 2020;Nikolaev et al, 2018;Sauliak, 2010).…”