2016
DOI: 10.1080/00141844.2016.1169201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economies of Growth or Ecologies of Survival?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Washington and Kopnina are quite explicit about it, “The insanity and unsustainability of endless economic growth is a critical reality that society must acknowledge and discuss.” (Washington and Kopnina, 2018, p. 62). Since “Limits to growth” was published (Meadows et al , 1972) and even before it (Carson, 1962; Hardin, 1968), many researchers and scientists have tried to call humanity’s attention to the unviability of limitless growth (Capra, 1983; Costanza and Daly, 1987; Scitovsky, 1992; Brown et al , 2011; Meadows and Randers, 2012; Dietz and O’Neill, 2013; Eriksen and Schober, 2018; Ardichvili, 2012). There is scientific consensus on this issue today (Kendall, 2000; Ripple et al , 2017).…”
Section: The Problem Of Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Washington and Kopnina are quite explicit about it, “The insanity and unsustainability of endless economic growth is a critical reality that society must acknowledge and discuss.” (Washington and Kopnina, 2018, p. 62). Since “Limits to growth” was published (Meadows et al , 1972) and even before it (Carson, 1962; Hardin, 1968), many researchers and scientists have tried to call humanity’s attention to the unviability of limitless growth (Capra, 1983; Costanza and Daly, 1987; Scitovsky, 1992; Brown et al , 2011; Meadows and Randers, 2012; Dietz and O’Neill, 2013; Eriksen and Schober, 2018; Ardichvili, 2012). There is scientific consensus on this issue today (Kendall, 2000; Ripple et al , 2017).…”
Section: The Problem Of Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the concept of impact often makes anthropologists uncomfortable, they do seem to pursue it with alacrity – even when they avoid the word. In a sombre special issue on climate change entitled ‘Economies of growth or ecologies of survival?’, Eriksen and Schober offer a fascinating look into how anthropologists might help broker between the divergent ‘scales’ necessary to connect local communities with ‘global environmental actors that take the high moral ground but disregard people's concerns over livelihoods’ (: 419). The global forces of environmental degradation repeatedly arouse local opposition, but institutionalised environmentalism seems to sail right past their concerns – at times literally (Eriksen ).…”
Section: The Rise Of Meta‐anthropologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that spirit, contributors to the special issue try to offer the most expansive possible sampling of relationships between labour and capital, seeking to avoid limiting the concept to wage labour (Cant 2018;Martin 2018;Narotzky 2018;Yanagisako 2018). Here, they make a deliberate decision to focus both on the now much-discussed precariat (Grill 2018;Harvey 2018;Eriksen and Schober 2018), but also the persistence of the state and far more stable labour relations among certain privileged groups (Campbell 2018;Hoëm 2018;Krohn-Hansen 2018). These authors all seem to be promoting the idea that, as Harvey and Krohn-Hansen frame it, even anthropologists who 'might not necessarily see themselves as working primarily on economic relations' can still use labour as 'a means of extending thought as we attempt to find ways to respond to the challenges of our contemporary world ' (2018: 28).…”
Section: T H E T U R N T O L a B O U Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situation appears like what Gregory Bateson calls 'double bind', 'a situation in which no matter what a person does, "he can't win"' (Bateson 1972: 205, cf. Green 2014Eriksen 2016). The anxiety and high level of tension that we note among the young migrants as well as their families at home seems to stem from this impasse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%