1997
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.8713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economies of Scale: A Survey of the Empirical Literature

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also note that the sign and magnitude of spillover effects cannot be deduced by examining the empirical evidence from other industries. Although evidence from other industries shows that economies of scale are, for the most part, pervasive (Junius 1997), there is conflicting evidence as to the extent and direction of scope effects. Benefits have been demonstrated to exist in contexts such as drug R&D (Henderson and Cockburn 1996) and advertising (Silk and Berndt 1993), while diseconomies have been found in others such as transportation (Rawley and Simcoe 2010) and automobile assembly (Fisher and Ittner 1999).…”
Section: Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also note that the sign and magnitude of spillover effects cannot be deduced by examining the empirical evidence from other industries. Although evidence from other industries shows that economies of scale are, for the most part, pervasive (Junius 1997), there is conflicting evidence as to the extent and direction of scope effects. Benefits have been demonstrated to exist in contexts such as drug R&D (Henderson and Cockburn 1996) and advertising (Silk and Berndt 1993), while diseconomies have been found in others such as transportation (Rawley and Simcoe 2010) and automobile assembly (Fisher and Ittner 1999).…”
Section: Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To increase the flow of young specialists to DIC enterprises a complex approach based on interaction of academic institutions and industrial enterprises is necessary to be developed. To provide the activity of future specialists three flows should be organized: youth; industrial enterprises that need new young specialists; scientists (Junius, 1997). Having united these three flows in the conditions of the system of additional education the increase of quality human resources in DIC can be made.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inadequate improvements in student outcomes and a turbulent environment have led systems and consortia to adapt in ways that include: (a) strengthening the vitality of the campuses that comprise them, (b) coordinating the work of campuses across shared goals and strategies, and (c) leveraging the collective capacity of campuses toward improved student outcomes. These efforts to better position systems and consortia to create economies of scale and scope may result in increasing efficiencies that allow for resources to be reallocated toward student success (Clark, ; Junius, ). Specifically, systems and consortia and campuses are targeting high‐impact practices, such as scaling UR (Kuh, ).…”
Section: The Implications Of a Shifting Landscape For Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%