2018
DOI: 10.1186/s40856-018-0024-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economies of scope: context of agriculture, small family farmers and sustainability

Abstract: What does this article offers? It raises questions on the assumptions of efficiency in agriculture, traces the history of the logic of scale replacing logic of scope, analyses its impact on sustainability and offers a framework to discern technical contradictions of efficiency across different sectors and find a balance for sustainability. It delves with a few basic questions: First, what is the assumption for efficiency in agriculture and food production? Second, how efficiency criterion of dominant players i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Small family farmers might have lower economics of scale, but they have higher economies of scope, implying that they tend to focus more on details that lead to high-quality produce. Besides, small family farmers tend to have more diverse and seasonal production systems (Principle 1) (Nayak, 2018). Favouring small production also keeps more income in the local economy, and it allows family farmers to capture a higher share of profits that are distributed across the value chain, thus it is an ethical decision to support them (Hebinck, Schneider, & van der Ploeg, 2014).…”
Section: Small Producersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small family farmers might have lower economics of scale, but they have higher economies of scope, implying that they tend to focus more on details that lead to high-quality produce. Besides, small family farmers tend to have more diverse and seasonal production systems (Principle 1) (Nayak, 2018). Favouring small production also keeps more income in the local economy, and it allows family farmers to capture a higher share of profits that are distributed across the value chain, thus it is an ethical decision to support them (Hebinck, Schneider, & van der Ploeg, 2014).…”
Section: Small Producersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at: https://www.emerald.com/insight/2044-0839.htm plethora of existing problems of small and marginal farmers (Nayak, 2018), and found to be a successful initiative to integrate them into modern supply chain for better performance (Bikkina et al, 2018). Several studies also confirm that collective action increases efficiency, productivity and performance of farmers (Uphoff and Wijayaratna, 2000;Grootaert and Bastelaer, 2002;Waddington et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In India, FPOs are being mobilized to build their own enterprises which in turn offer farmers to participate effectively in the field production and market activities (Krishna et al. , 2018), these collectives have started business under hybrid model of company and cooperative to solve plethora of existing problems of small and marginal farmers (Nayak, 2018), and found to be a successful initiative to integrate them into modern supply chain for better performance (Bikkina et al. , 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%