2001
DOI: 10.1007/s004420100714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecophysiological consequences of differences in plant size: abscisic acid relationships in the epiphytic orchid Dimerandra emarginata

Abstract: Changes in abscisic acid (ABA) content and several water relations parameters were studied in the epiphytic orchid Dimerandra emarginata in the tropical lowlands of Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Similar to previous observations of size dependency of physiological parameters in vascular epiphytes, we found significant differences in ABA accumulation (both in terms of temporal patterns and amount) in small and large plants under drought stress. The highest values of ABA content in leaves, stems, and roots were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Effect of watering was highly significant (Po0.001), and interaction effects between watering and ecotype were also significant in these properties except for d 13 C. It showed that the dry climate ecotype exhibited a distinctly higher WUE T , WUE i , ABA and d 13 C than the wet climate ecotype under low soil water contents. Interestingly, ecotypic differences in ABA and d 13 C were less in high soil water contents than in low soil water contents, suggesting that relationships between physiological responses and drought adaptations were complicated by internal drought tolerance mechanisms and external environmental factors such as water availability, or their interaction (Brodribb and Hill, 1998;Amdt et al, 2001;Zotz et al, 2001;Ponton et al, 2002;Sharp, 2002). In addition, although d 13 C was increased significantly by low soil water contents, no interaction between ecotype and watering was detected, which is consistent with most previous studies (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Effect of watering was highly significant (Po0.001), and interaction effects between watering and ecotype were also significant in these properties except for d 13 C. It showed that the dry climate ecotype exhibited a distinctly higher WUE T , WUE i , ABA and d 13 C than the wet climate ecotype under low soil water contents. Interestingly, ecotypic differences in ABA and d 13 C were less in high soil water contents than in low soil water contents, suggesting that relationships between physiological responses and drought adaptations were complicated by internal drought tolerance mechanisms and external environmental factors such as water availability, or their interaction (Brodribb and Hill, 1998;Amdt et al, 2001;Zotz et al, 2001;Ponton et al, 2002;Sharp, 2002). In addition, although d 13 C was increased significantly by low soil water contents, no interaction between ecotype and watering was detected, which is consistent with most previous studies (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the adaptive responses to water deficit are physiological and morphological changes, such as changes in plant structure, growth rate, tissue osmotic potential and stomatal conductance (Jones, 1992;Larcher, 1995). On the other hand, abscisic acid (ABA), a well-known stress-inducible plant hormone and growth inhibitor, has long been studied as a potential mediator for induction of drought tolerance in plants (Zhang and Davies, 1989;Chen et al, 1997;Zotz et al, 2001;Sharp, 2002). ABA seems to play a predominant role in the conversion of environmental signals into changes in plant gene expression (Bray, 2002;Zhu, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, photosynthetic rates of leaves are not expected to vary dramatically, provided such rates are compared on an equal area or mass basis. Recent studies by Zotz and colleagues, however, indicate that ignoring plant size in physiological studies may lead to erroneous conclusions (Zotz 1997;Zotz et al 2001aZotz et al , 2001b. They provide convincing evidence that, at least in some epiphytic taxa, physiological parameters of leaves can vary depending on the size of the plant selected for measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Differences in leaf morphology may explain some effects of plant size , although and Zotz et al (2001aZotz et al ( , 2001b argue that size-related differences in biomass allocation as they relate to plant water relations correlate well with differences in the functioning of plants of different sizes. Clearly, more work is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying differences in physiology that correlate with plant size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation