1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.1992.tb01313.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecophysiological relations in two Douglas fir stands in the Netherlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysed needle samples included both current year needles and needles from previous years, which may have dampened seasonal changes in N pools in our observations. Minor differences between N concentrations in different age classes of Douglas fir have previously been observed at the Dutch site, older needles having slightly higher N values than young needles, as was also the case for sunlit compared to shade needles (Evers et al, 1991). Slightly higher N concentrations in older needles compared to current year needles was later confirmed by Boxman et al (1995) and Koopmans et al (1997).…”
Section: Differences In Seasonal and Spatial Variation Of Foliar N Cosupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The analysed needle samples included both current year needles and needles from previous years, which may have dampened seasonal changes in N pools in our observations. Minor differences between N concentrations in different age classes of Douglas fir have previously been observed at the Dutch site, older needles having slightly higher N values than young needles, as was also the case for sunlit compared to shade needles (Evers et al, 1991). Slightly higher N concentrations in older needles compared to current year needles was later confirmed by Boxman et al (1995) and Koopmans et al (1997).…”
Section: Differences In Seasonal and Spatial Variation Of Foliar N Cosupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The analysed needle L. Wang et al: Interactions between leaf nitrogen status and longevity samples included both current year needles and needles from previous years, which may have dampened seasonal changes in N pools in our observations. Minor differences between N concentrations in different age classes of Douglas fir have previously been observed at the Dutch site, older needles having slightly higher N values than young needles, as was also the case for sunlit compared to shade needles (Evers et al, 1991). Slightly higher N concentrations in older needles compared to current year needles was later confirmed by Boxman et al (1995) and Koopmans et al (1997).…”
Section: Differences In Seasonal and Spatial Variation Of Foliar N Cosupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Despite other reports that Douglas fir is fairly resistant to ozone (Davis & Wood, 1972), the results of our field experiments show that photosynthesis may be affected at ozone concentrations of 200 fig m "^ after only 9 d fumigation. Evers, Steingrover & Jans (1992) also demonstrated that photosynthesis was affected by relatively low ozone concentrations in a field experiment with mature Douglas fir. Photosynthesis of 1-yr-old needles appeared to decrease almost immediately with ozone concentrations above 140//gm^''.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%