2021
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecosystem engineering alters density‐dependent feedbacks in an aquatic insect population

Abstract: Ecosystem engineers have large impacts on the communities in which they live, and these impacts may feed back to populations of engineers themselves. In this study, we assessed the effect of ecosystem engineering on density-dependent feedbacks for midges in Lake Mývatn, Iceland. The midge larvae reside in the sediment and build silk tubes that provide a substrate for algal growth, thereby elevating benthic primary production. Benthic algae are in turn the primary food source for the midge larvae, setting the s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous experiments, reducing per capita resource availability by increasing midge density resulted in fewer emerging T. gracilentus , higher mortality rates, and smaller larvae (Phillips et al 2021a, Wetzel et al 2021). Additionally, reductions in per capita algal growth rates via shading resulted in lower midge survival, growth, and emergence (Wetzel et al 2021, Phillips et al 2021b). Studies on other midge species that have manipulated food quantity have shown a similar response (Rasmussen 1985, Macchiusi and Baker 1992, Vos et al 2000, Péry et al 2002, Hooper et al 2003, Doi et al 2007); however, these studies generally used non‐growing food (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous experiments, reducing per capita resource availability by increasing midge density resulted in fewer emerging T. gracilentus , higher mortality rates, and smaller larvae (Phillips et al 2021a, Wetzel et al 2021). Additionally, reductions in per capita algal growth rates via shading resulted in lower midge survival, growth, and emergence (Wetzel et al 2021, Phillips et al 2021b). Studies on other midge species that have manipulated food quantity have shown a similar response (Rasmussen 1985, Macchiusi and Baker 1992, Vos et al 2000, Péry et al 2002, Hooper et al 2003, Doi et al 2007); however, these studies generally used non‐growing food (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, low‐to‐moderate experimental densities of T. gracilentus larvae enhance benthic primary production by increasing substrate availability through their tube building (Phillips et al, 2019). However, the relationship between larval density and primary production is nonlinear and, at high larval densities, consumption of benthic algae may outweigh their substrate‐boosting effect (Phillips et al, 2021). Thus, it is likely that high T. gracilentus densities negatively affect primary production (Phillips et al, 2021), which is consistent with our results if δ 13 C is treated as a surrogate for benthic algal production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the relationship between larval density and primary production is nonlinear and, at high larval densities, consumption of benthic algae may outweigh their substrate‐boosting effect (Phillips et al, 2021). Thus, it is likely that high T. gracilentus densities negatively affect primary production (Phillips et al, 2021), which is consistent with our results if δ 13 C is treated as a surrogate for benthic algal production. Moreover, in a paleoecology study at Mývatn, high concentrations of diatom pigments were associated with increased midge egg capsule abundance, and increased midge abundance was associated with declines in the diatom pigment (Einarsson et al, 2016), suggesting that midges reduce diatom biomass as their population grows.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the light treatment microcosms were processed 1 day before the dark treatment ones, which could have resulted in inflated survival and depressed body size in the high light treatment; however, the effect of 1 day is likely modest relative to the full duration of the experiment. While phosphorous limitation of benthic algae has been demonstrated in many systems (Fairchild & Lowe, 1984; Fairchild et al ., 1985; Steinman et al ., 2016), it has not been observed as a limiting factor for benthic primary production in Mývatn (McCormick et al ., 2019; Phillips et al ., 2019), likely due to Mývatn's high phosphorous inputs and large pools in the sediment. These previous results suggest that phosphorous enrichment does not lead to elevated primary producer biomass in Mývatn, although it could lead to a reduction in C:P ratios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two light levels were achieved by covering half of the microcosms with two layers of 1 mm mosquito mesh (130 μmol‐photons m −2 s −1 ) and leaving the other half uncovered (230 μmol‐photons m −2 s −1 ). The darker treatment was close to mean benthic light levels in Mývatn (McCormick et al ., 2019), and both were within regularly experienced in situ benthic light levels (Phillips et al ., 2019). We based our concentrations for the nutrient treatments on previously measured interstitial concentrations of NH 4 (1000 μmol L −1 ) and PO 4 (65 μmol L −1 ) in Mývatn's sediment (Gíslason et al ., 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%