2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecosystem services and renewable power generation: A preliminary literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the present paper highlights recent empirical evidence on use and non-use values of impacts associated with hydropower, which implies that failing to incorporate such values in the appraisal of dams' construction and operation is unwarranted and may lead to misguided public decision-making, in the sense that it would be ignoring some of the value lost. It should, however, be noted that while non-market valuation methods can expand the types of costs and benefits included in hydropower projects appraisals, when more complex ecosystems services are considered, other types of analyses are required [101]. Furthermore, the interaction between economics and ecologic and social systems is hard to capture within the cost-benefit analysis framework given the presence of uncertainties and the possibility of irreversibilities in hydropower projects [102].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the present paper highlights recent empirical evidence on use and non-use values of impacts associated with hydropower, which implies that failing to incorporate such values in the appraisal of dams' construction and operation is unwarranted and may lead to misguided public decision-making, in the sense that it would be ignoring some of the value lost. It should, however, be noted that while non-market valuation methods can expand the types of costs and benefits included in hydropower projects appraisals, when more complex ecosystems services are considered, other types of analyses are required [101]. Furthermore, the interaction between economics and ecologic and social systems is hard to capture within the cost-benefit analysis framework given the presence of uncertainties and the possibility of irreversibilities in hydropower projects [102].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This meta study draws upon academic literature pertaining to CAES within the context of power generation and distribution. [25].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The installation and operation of electricity generation installations can have non-negligible impacts (e.g., [ 19 , 20 ]) and these vary across energy sources. In terms of broad categories of impacts, studies have documented the negative impact in terms of landscape intrusion, visual pollution, wildlife disruptions and biodiversity effects of windpower (e.g., [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]), hydropower (e.g., [ 24 , 25 , 26 ]) and solar photovoltaic energy (e.g., [ 17 , 27 , 28 ]).…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%