2015
DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa4785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecosystem services lost to oil and gas in North America

Abstract: SCIENCE sciencemag.org water use. Before this work, little has been done in examining these types of data and their relations with ecosystem services at broad scales. ECOSYSTEM SERVICE TRADE-OFFS. NPP is the amount of carbon fixed by plants and accumulated as biomass. It is a fundamental and supporting ecosystem service that is the basis for all life on Earth (8). As such, the dynamics of NPP affect regional ability to provide a host of other essential ecosystem services (e.g., food production, biodiversity, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
157
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 279 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
157
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…NPP is so closely connected with primary producers that it could be considered as the foundation of ecosystem services. Thus, NPP has been widely used as a key indicator to reflect the ecosystem productivity1330313233.…”
Section: Methodology and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NPP is so closely connected with primary producers that it could be considered as the foundation of ecosystem services. Thus, NPP has been widely used as a key indicator to reflect the ecosystem productivity1330313233.…”
Section: Methodology and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a manner not seen since the pre-industrial era (Hornborg 2013), harvesting energy sources at the Earth's surface on a global scale implies a deep restructuring of physical space (Smil 2015;Huber and McCarthy 2017), exacerbating tensions around existing and future use of lands and oceans (Gasparatos et al 2017;Huber and McCarthy 2017). Although continued use of nonrenewable energy sources requires ongoing expansion (Allred et al 2015), compared to these conventional systems, renewable energy technologies require more physical space to deliver the same amount of power (i.e., lower rate of energy flow per unit of surface area) (MacKay 2010;Smil 2015;Capellán-Pérez, de Castro, and Arto 2017). Power densities of efficient petroleum and coal sources vary from around 1000-10,000 We/m 2 , while renewables generally range from highs for hydroelectricity of around 0.5-200 We/m 2 , to lower power densities for solar and wind around 0.5-10 and less than 1 We/m 2 for biomass and biofuels (Smil 2015;Capellán-Pérez, de Castro, and Arto 2017).…”
Section: Renewable Energy and The Natural World: Relevance Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, expanding from evaluating effects of proposed actions at the scale of individual sites to considering effects at multiple spatial and temporal scales and on multiple natural resources is still a developing science (Haines and others, 2014;Jones and others, 2015). Unanticipated ecological and policy interactions may be evident only when examined at a variety of scales (Smith andothers, 2011, Sunderland andothers, 2015). Considering cultural, visual, and other human dimensions resources, some without defined tools for multiscale analyses, adds additional complexity.…”
Section: Management Questions Across Spatial Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%