Tomato poses the second-largest acreage among vegetables
worldwide;
however, its yields are severely lowered by more than 200 diseases.
Compared to the conventional pesticides’ high ecosystem risks,
nanopesticides have emerged as an alternative with higher efficacy.
Nevertheless, a systematic investigation on the efficacy and the associated
cost analysis of nanopesticides and conventional pesticides is yet
to be done, which is essential to evaluate the application of nanopesticides.
Thus, we used Cu-based pesticides for controlling tomato disease as
a case study to explore the efficacy and cost trade-offs between nano-
and conventional analogues. Ten peer-reviewed papers were fully studied,
and we extracted data on indicators, including percent efficacy of
disease control (PEDC), active ingredients (AIs), concentration, application
volume, application method of pesticides, and plant biomass. The material
efficiency (i.e., dosages of pesticides applied per plant per unit
efficacy) and cost-effectiveness (i.e., cost of pesticides applied
per plant per unit efficacy) were calculated for comparative analysis.
The findings indicated that the efficacy of Cu-based nanopesticides
improved by 16–20%, with 4.3-fold material efficiency enhancement
compared to conventional analogues, suggesting that Cu-based nanopesticides
significantly reduced application dosages (i.e., using ∼1/5
dosages of conventional analogues) to achieve equivalent efficacy.
In addition, Cu-based nanopesticides could promote plant biomass by
approximately 40% more than conventional pesticides under diseases.
CuO, Cu(OH)2, and GO–Cu nanopesticides could reduce
cost per unit efficacy by 46.6, 11.6, and 46.8–83.4%, respectively.
The size, shape, chemical composition, dosage, and application method
of nanopesticides were revealed to be significant determinants of
nanopesticides’ efficacy using an ordinary least squares model.
Our quantitative results identified the extent of advantages that
Cu-based nanopesticides have over conventional products from technological
efficacy and economic perspectives. This efficacy–cost study
is the key evaluation prior to large-scale application of nanopesticides,
contributing to the development of nanopesticides, the enhancement
of crop production, and agricultural sustainability.