1985
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330680106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ectocranial suture closure: A revised method for the determination of skeletal age at death based on the lateral‐anterior sutures

Abstract: A new method for estimation of age-at-death based on the degree of suture closure is presented. The method employs simple ectocranial scoring of specific sites on the external table. Composite scores for two groups of sutures, lateral-anterior and vault systems, which are used to provide estimates of age-at-death, have been developed from a sample of 236 crania from the Hamann-Todd Collection. A variety of tests show that the lateral-anterior sutures are superior to the sutures of the vault, that ectocranial i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
691
1
62

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,207 publications
(772 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
18
691
1
62
Order By: Relevance
“…Age‐at‐death was estimated on the basis of the morphological characteristics of the pubic symphyses and auricular surfaces of the coxal bones (Brooks & Suchey, 1990; Lovejoy, Meindl, Pryzbeck, & Mensforth, 1985), the sternal ends of the ribs (İşcan & Loth, 1986; İşcan, Loth, & Wright, 1984), as well as late‐stage epiphyseal fusion in young adults (Scheuer & Black, 2000), and stages of cranial suture obliteration in older adults (Meindl & Lovejoy, 1985). Each adult skeleton was assigned to one of four age categories: 18–25 years (young adult), 26–35 years (early middle adult); 36–45 years (late middle adult) or ≥ 46 years (older adult) in accordance with the Museum of London Human Osteology Method Statement protocol (Powers, 2012) and agreed standard praxis in Irish osteoarchaeological research (Irish Association of Professional Osteoarchaeologists [IAPO], 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age‐at‐death was estimated on the basis of the morphological characteristics of the pubic symphyses and auricular surfaces of the coxal bones (Brooks & Suchey, 1990; Lovejoy, Meindl, Pryzbeck, & Mensforth, 1985), the sternal ends of the ribs (İşcan & Loth, 1986; İşcan, Loth, & Wright, 1984), as well as late‐stage epiphyseal fusion in young adults (Scheuer & Black, 2000), and stages of cranial suture obliteration in older adults (Meindl & Lovejoy, 1985). Each adult skeleton was assigned to one of four age categories: 18–25 years (young adult), 26–35 years (early middle adult); 36–45 years (late middle adult) or ≥ 46 years (older adult) in accordance with the Museum of London Human Osteology Method Statement protocol (Powers, 2012) and agreed standard praxis in Irish osteoarchaeological research (Irish Association of Professional Osteoarchaeologists [IAPO], 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sex was estimated by scoring 23 characteristics outlined in Éry (1992) and Éry et al (1963). Adult age was estimated using degeneration of the pubic symphyseal face (Brooks and Suchey 1990), the sternal ends of ribs (Íșcan et al 1985; Íșcan et al 1984), and cranial suture closure (Meindl and Lovejoy 1985;Nemeskéri et al 1960). In instances of poor preservation, dental attrition scores were used to place individuals within a broad age group (Éry 1992;Huszár and Schranz 1952 estimates too broad for a single category were classified as "adult".…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the age range of adults in archaeological samples is still quite large (18-60 years), growth during this age period is limited when compared to the age categories preceding the adult stage. Estimation of age at death was achieved by combining the results of several different methods: sternal rib end deformation developed by İşcan et al (1984), cranial suture closure developed by Meindl and Lovejoy (1985), pubic symphysis changes developed by Brooks and Suchey (1990), dental attrition ageing published by Maat (2001), and finally the auricular surface ageing method developed by Buckberry and Chamberlain (2002). Estimation of sex was done according to the standards by Buikstra and Ubelaker (1994).…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%