2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.funeco.2015.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities in Nothofagus nervosa ( Raulí ): A comparison between domesticated and naturally established specimens in a native forest of Patagonia, Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that N. pumilio seedling root systems were highly colonized by EMF (∼97% across all the studied treatments). These findings are similar to reports that both young and mature Nothofagus roots have high colonization levels of >70% ( Diehl, Mazzarino & Fontenla, 2008 ; Fernández et al, 2015 ) and reinforce findings from the Northern Hemisphere where inoculum levels in logged areas remain high ( Perry et al, 1982 ; Jones, Durall & Cairney, 2003 ) even when strong differences in fungal composition occur after harvest. Despite overall high colonization levels, mycorrhizal colonization was lowest in DR sites akin to observations of reduced EMF root presence in harvested New Zealand Nothofagus forests ( Dickie, Richardson & Wiser, 2009 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We found that N. pumilio seedling root systems were highly colonized by EMF (∼97% across all the studied treatments). These findings are similar to reports that both young and mature Nothofagus roots have high colonization levels of >70% ( Diehl, Mazzarino & Fontenla, 2008 ; Fernández et al, 2015 ) and reinforce findings from the Northern Hemisphere where inoculum levels in logged areas remain high ( Perry et al, 1982 ; Jones, Durall & Cairney, 2003 ) even when strong differences in fungal composition occur after harvest. Despite overall high colonization levels, mycorrhizal colonization was lowest in DR sites akin to observations of reduced EMF root presence in harvested New Zealand Nothofagus forests ( Dickie, Richardson & Wiser, 2009 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Some of the ECM fungi consumed by S. rubecula and P. tarnii, such as Cystangium nothofagi and species of Cortinarius, Descolea, and Inocybe, are important ECM fungi that colonize the roots of seedlings and saplings of several species of Nothofagaceae. [82][83][84] The results of our viability tests show that nearly half of the fungal spores in fecal samples are able to survive intact after passage through the digestive systems of the birds. It is important to note that not all structurally intact spores are capable of germinating and that our estimates cannot assess the germination rate itself, only the structural integrity of the spores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Our results from the DGGE analyses showed that variation between the different rhizosphere fungal communities depended mainly on the substrate (tephra or native forest soil) and forest site. Significant differences between substrates or sampling sites were not found for Ascomycetes (Figure 1a of which are Basidiomycetes (Tedersoo et al, 2009, Nouhra et al, 2013, Fernández et al, 2015, and that this symbiosis had been registered in N. pumilio seedlings growing in the tephra, this phenomenon could be attributed to the composition of ectomycorrhizal communities, which would be similar in seedlings growing in tephra (CS1 and CS2) but completely different in those located in native forest soil (CO). This is because a volcanic eruption creates a vast barren desert for primary succession due to the recently deposited tephra, where there are very few or no initial fungal propagules, (Nara et al, 2003;Allen et al, 2005;Yamanaka and Okabe 2006), while in the forest soil there are mature and well-established microbial communities and functional mycorrhizal networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Consequently, in terms of research these organisms represent one of the most interesting microbial groups in the soil environment. The fact that in Patagonia several studies are being carried out on mycorrhizas (Fontenla et al, 1998;Fernández et al, 2012;Nouhra et al, 2013;Fernández et al, 2015;Marín et al, 2016) and other soil fungal communities (Mestre et al, 2011;Díaz et al, 2017) reinforces the importance of describing these organisms in natural ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%