2021
DOI: 10.1017/jpa.2021.92
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ectoparasite borings, mesoparasite borings, and scavenging traces in early Miocene turtle and tortoise shell: Moghra Formation, Wadi Moghra, Egypt

Abstract: Borings and bite marks on fossil turtle carapaces and plastra from the Miocene Moghra Formation, northern Egypt, are herein described. All fossil turtle material from Moghra exhibits ichnofossils. The positions of invertebrate borings on external surfaces of tortoise and turtle shell material at Moghra are consistent with the activities of ectoparasites or mesoparasites. A single invertebrate ichnotaxon, Karethraichnus lakkos Zonneveld et al., 2016, occurs on Moghra tortoise fossils. This trace fossil was l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
(209 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The morphology and size of the bore marks on RAM 27109 are consistent with Karethraichnus lakkos Zonneveld, Bartels, Gunnell and McHugh, 2016, a common ectoparasitic ichnotaxon on turtles and tortoises from Cretaceous and Tertiary deposits in North America and Africa (Zonneveld et al 2016(Zonneveld et al , 2021Adrian et al 2021). Congeneric ichnospecies are also known from a Campanian dermochelyid (marine) turtle in Japan and from Late Pleistocene armadillos in Brazil (Sato and Jenkins 2020;Moura et al 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The morphology and size of the bore marks on RAM 27109 are consistent with Karethraichnus lakkos Zonneveld, Bartels, Gunnell and McHugh, 2016, a common ectoparasitic ichnotaxon on turtles and tortoises from Cretaceous and Tertiary deposits in North America and Africa (Zonneveld et al 2016(Zonneveld et al , 2021Adrian et al 2021). Congeneric ichnospecies are also known from a Campanian dermochelyid (marine) turtle in Japan and from Late Pleistocene armadillos in Brazil (Sato and Jenkins 2020;Moura et al 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Congeneric ichnospecies are also known from a Campanian dermochelyid (marine) turtle in Japan and from Late Pleistocene armadillos in Brazil (Sato and Jenkins 2020;Moura et al 2021). Tracemakers usually associated with K. lakkos include leeches and ixodid arthropods (ticks), which are known to feed on blood sinuses within shell bone, especially at sulci between epidermal scales (Siddall and Gaffney 2004;Zonneveld et al 2016Zonneveld et al , 2021. Bore marks of K. lakkos are only emplaced in locations accessible on living turtles-external surfaces of the carapace and plastron, especially at marginal or lip areas (Zonneveld et al 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seigel 1983), and turtle barnacles are sometimes referred to as parasites (e.g. Zonneveld et al 2022). As a matter of fact, there is some indication that some sea turtles may actively remove their epibiota by scrapping the shell against bottom rocks (Frick and McFall 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has started to change during the last few years, especially in the light of new research approaches that promote the integration between trace and body fossil analyses to identify and qualify ancient symbiotic associations, often based on the detection of skeletal intergrowths and bioclaustration structures (e.g. Yuan et al 2005;Tapanila 2008;Tapanila and Ekdale 2007;Stanley and Schootbrugge 2009;De Baets et al 2015;Wilson 2015, 2016;Vinn et al , 2018Vinn et al , 2019Vinn et al , 2021Vinn 2016Vinn , 2017aRobin et al 2016, Robin 2021Zonneveld et al 2022). Only a few studies, however, have explored the deep past of sea turtle epibiosis based on palaeontological lines of evidence (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many taphonomic processes may modify animal carcasses and bones between the time of death and the burial (e.g., [1][2][3]). Also, some parasites can modify bone tissue during the life of the animal [4,5]. The analysis of surface modifications on bone remains and the recognition of the different agents involved have exponentially grown during the last few decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%