1992
DOI: 10.1016/0925-4773(92)90021-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ectopic expression of Hox-2.3 induces craniofacial and skeletal malformations in transgenic mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also in the bmi-1 -/-mice it is unclear whether the broadening and the splitting of the atlas (C1) or the axis (C2) is true posterior transformation. However, a similar alteration is observed in hoxb-7 transgenic mice (McLain et al 1992;for new nomenclature, see Scott 1992), which simultaneously display posterior transformation of C7 to T1. Possibly, partial redundancy, because of overlapping expression of paralogs from the different hox clusters in the mouse, might obscure clear transformation.…”
Section: Posterior Transformation In the Bmi-1 -/-Micementioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also in the bmi-1 -/-mice it is unclear whether the broadening and the splitting of the atlas (C1) or the axis (C2) is true posterior transformation. However, a similar alteration is observed in hoxb-7 transgenic mice (McLain et al 1992;for new nomenclature, see Scott 1992), which simultaneously display posterior transformation of C7 to T1. Possibly, partial redundancy, because of overlapping expression of paralogs from the different hox clusters in the mouse, might obscure clear transformation.…”
Section: Posterior Transformation In the Bmi-1 -/-Micementioning
confidence: 73%
“…The identity of a given vertebra has changed to that of the juxtaposed posterior vertebra, a feature described as posterior transformation. Several hox gain-and loss-of-function mutant mice show comparable posterior or anterior transformation of the axial skeleton (Kessel et al 1990;Chisaka and Capecchi 1991;Lufkin et al 1991Lufkin et al , 1992Jegalian and De Robertis 1992;Le Mouellic et al 1992;McLain et al 1992;Pollock et al 1992;Ramirez-Solis et al 1993), supporting the role of hox genes in the specification of structures along the anteroposterior axis of the developing embryo (for review, see Deschamps and Meijlink 1992;McGinnis and Krumlauf 1992). The effects of some hox mutations, however, are complex and difficult to identify as posterior or anterior transformation (Chisaka et al 1992).…”
Section: Posterior Transformation In the Bmi-1 -/-Micementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Hox genes has been established by their homology to Drosophila genes of known developmental significance (McGinnis and Krumlauf, 19921, by their suggestive embryonic expression patterns (Holland and Hogan, 1988), and by both dominant gain of function (Wolgemuth et al, 1989;Kessel et al, 1990;Kaur et al, 1992;McLain et al, 1992;Jegalian and De Robertis, 1992;Pollock et al, 1992;Lufkin et al, 1992;Charite et al, 1994) and recessive loss of function (Chisaka and Capecchi, 1991;Lufkin et al, 1991;Chisaka et al, 1992;Mouellic et al, 1992;Ramirez-Solis et al, 1993;Dolle et al, 1993;Small and Potter, 1993) mutational analyses in mice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among skeletal abnormalities, cleft palate phenotypes have been detected in Hoxa2 -/-mice (GendronMaguire et al, 1993). These phenotypes have also been observed in Hoxa7 and Hoxb7 gain of function mice (Balling et al, 1989;McLain et al, 1992). …”
Section: Phenotypes Of Hox Mutantsmentioning
confidence: 58%