2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eddy properties in the Mozambique Channel: A comparison between observations and two numerical ocean circulation models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

10
200
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
10
200
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of the hybrid eddy detection algorithm used in our study (Halo 2012;Halo et al 2014) has been tested successfully in the Lofoten Basin (Raj et al 2015). Eddy detection in the Lofoten Basin using this method has also been validated using Argo floats and surface drifters (Raj et al 2016).…”
Section: Eddy Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the hybrid eddy detection algorithm used in our study (Halo 2012;Halo et al 2014) has been tested successfully in the Lofoten Basin (Raj et al 2015). Eddy detection in the Lofoten Basin using this method has also been validated using Argo floats and surface drifters (Raj et al 2016).…”
Section: Eddy Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work we used a hybrid detection method (Halo et al, 2014): a combination of detecting the largest contours in SLA data (geometric criteria ) and computing the W parameter (traditional physical method (Chelton et al, 2007)). …”
Section: The Hybrid Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association of regions of negative W and regions embedded in SLA closed loops avoids the detection of spurious features due to noise and removes the ambiguities in multi-poles/elongated closed loops (Halo et al, 2014). Furthermore, structures with lifetime shorter than 7 days are not considered in the analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations