1991
DOI: 10.1016/0095-8956(91)90002-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edge-disjoint in- and out-branchings in tournaments and related path problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This problem is easily seen to be NP-complete, since there is a trivial reduction of the 2-path problem to this problem. It was shown in [10] that in the case of arc-disjoint paths the characterization for semicomplete digraphs given in [5] still holds for quasi-transitive digraphs and locally in-semicomplete digraphs. In the case of internally vertex-disjoint paths (i.e., when we want an (x, z)-path that passes through y) it was pointed out in [10] that the complete characterization for semicomplete digraphs given in [4] is also valid for quasi-transitive digraphs.…”
Section: Disjoint Pathsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This problem is easily seen to be NP-complete, since there is a trivial reduction of the 2-path problem to this problem. It was shown in [10] that in the case of arc-disjoint paths the characterization for semicomplete digraphs given in [5] still holds for quasi-transitive digraphs and locally in-semicomplete digraphs. In the case of internally vertex-disjoint paths (i.e., when we want an (x, z)-path that passes through y) it was pointed out in [10] that the complete characterization for semicomplete digraphs given in [4] is also valid for quasi-transitive digraphs.…”
Section: Disjoint Pathsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Given this result, a natural question is whether in polynomial time one can find an out-branching and an in-branching that are arc-disjoint. However, it is NP-complete to decide whether a given digraph has a pair of arc-disjoint branchings B + s , B − t [2]. In fact, as was shown recently by two of the authors, this already holds for 2-regular digraphs [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…v) be the in-neighbor (resp. out-neighbor) of h in P 1 , let a be a vertex of H. As the arcs ua, av must be in A(D), the path P 1 := P 1 …”
Section: Lemma 23 Let D Be a Digraph A List Of K Terminal Pairs Anmentioning
confidence: 99%