1990
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.41.12441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edge dislocations in fcc metals: Microscopic calculations of core structure and positron states in Al and Cu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
52
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
14
52
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This smearing is also observed in computer simulations [34][35][36] of edge dislocations in Cu. In Fig.…”
Section: Splitting Widthsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This smearing is also observed in computer simulations [34][35][36] of edge dislocations in Cu. In Fig.…”
Section: Splitting Widthsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This is in disagreement with first results obtained with pair potentials [8,11] but confirms most recent studies using most reliable empirical potentials like EAM [17], TB-SMA [18], or pseudopotentials [15,16]. The corresponding interaction energies are displayed in Tab.…”
Section: Vacancy-dislocation Interactioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…On the other hand, EAM and TB-SMA potentials do not suffer such restrictions and have been shown to be well suited to study dislocation behavior. Some authors used these potentials to study the behavior of vacancies in the vicinity of dislocations, in particular to simulate pipe-diffusion in fcc metals [15][16][17][18][19][20]. These studies showed that the most stable position of the vacancy lies at the edge of the supplementary half plane corresponding to a partial dislocation and that diffusion is faster along dislocations than in the bulk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the conjugate-gradient relaxation, the edge dislocation splits into two partials with a stacking fault region between them. The width of stacking fault was 3.3 nm, which is within the reported values of 2.7 nm-3.6 nm for Cu [56] . This width is determined by the balance between the repulsive force of partial dislocations and the stacking fault energy.…”
Section: Simulations At the Atomic Scalesupporting
confidence: 65%