2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11265-017-1320-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edge-Fitting Based Energy Detection for Cognitive Radios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…technique [19], and the first order statistical technique (FOST) [20], Barne's approach [21], and many other methods as in [22][23][24][25][26]. Essentially, these methods depend on critical parameters that are fine-tuned a priori based on some input noise level or some theoretical distribution of the input sample.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…technique [19], and the first order statistical technique (FOST) [20], Barne's approach [21], and many other methods as in [22][23][24][25][26]. Essentially, these methods depend on critical parameters that are fine-tuned a priori based on some input noise level or some theoretical distribution of the input sample.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum normal fit method proposed by Barnes et al, also requires the manual fine‐tuning of a few parameters, such as the initial SD and amplitude of the estimated noise distribution 9 . Most methods identified in References 10‐15 typically depend on different parameter values that must be fine‐tuned in order to enhance the performance of the different ATEs. Primarily, most authors often refine the parameters of their respective ATEs by testing them using predefined datasets, or in some other cases, by theoretical computations based on presumed distributions 16 .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, manual tuning can be a cumbersome process, particularly for ATEs characterized by large number of parameters. It is also impossible to obtain global parameter values for every ATE across all possible sensing conditions and signal types, a fact that is evident across most ATEs 10‐15,17,18 …”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%