2019
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.100.053813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edge states of photon pairs in cavity arrays with spatially modulated nonlinearity

Abstract: We study theoretically an extended Bose-Hubbard model with the spatially modulated interaction strength, describing a one-dimensional array of tunneling-coupled nonlinear cavities. It is demonstrated that the spatial modulation of the nonlinearity induces bound two-photon edge states. The formation of these edge states has been understood analytically in terms of nonlinear self-localization.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These two-body states, which are stable even for repulsive interactions due to the finite bandwidth of the singleparticle kinetic energy [9], have been observed [10][11][12][13] and extensively analyzed [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] in optical lattices, and have also been emulated in photonic systems [26,27] and in topolectrical circuits [28]. Motivated in part by these advances, several recent works have focused on the topological properties of two-body states [13,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], with the long-term aim of paving the path to a better comprehension of topological phases in a full many-body interacting scenario. A distinctive advantage that these small-sized systems offer is that it is often possible to map the problem of two interacting particles in a lattice into a single-particle model defined in a different lattice, the topological characterization of which can then be performed with well-established techniques [31][32][33]36,40,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two-body states, which are stable even for repulsive interactions due to the finite bandwidth of the singleparticle kinetic energy [9], have been observed [10][11][12][13] and extensively analyzed [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] in optical lattices, and have also been emulated in photonic systems [26,27] and in topolectrical circuits [28]. Motivated in part by these advances, several recent works have focused on the topological properties of two-body states [13,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], with the long-term aim of paving the path to a better comprehension of topological phases in a full many-body interacting scenario. A distinctive advantage that these small-sized systems offer is that it is often possible to map the problem of two interacting particles in a lattice into a single-particle model defined in a different lattice, the topological characterization of which can then be performed with well-established techniques [31][32][33]36,40,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two-body states, which are stable even for repulsive interactions due to the finite bandwidth of the single-particle kinetic energy [9], have been observed [10][11][12][13] and extensively analyzed [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] in optical lattices, and have also been emulated in photonic systems [26,27] and in topolectrical circuits [28]. Motivated in part by these advances, several recent works have focused on the topological properties of two-body states [13,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], with the long-term aim of paving the path to a better comprehension of topological phases in a full many-body interacting scenario. A distinctive advantage that these small-sized systems offer is that it is often possible to map the prob-lem of two interacting particles in a lattice into a singleparticle model defined in a different lattice, the topological characterization of which can then be performed with well-established techniques [31-33, 36, 40, 41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%