Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) offer unprecedented opportunities to study cellular differentiation and model human diseases. The ability to precisely modify any genomic sequence holds the key to realizing the full potential of hPSCs. Thanks to the rapid development of novel genome editing technologies driven by the enormous interest in the hPSC field, genome editing in hPSCs has evolved from being a daunting task a few years ago to a routine procedure in most laboratories. Here, we provide an overview of the mainstream genome editing tools, including zinc finger nucleases, transcription activator-like effector nucleases, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat/CAS9 RNA-guided nucleases, and helper-dependent adenoviral vectors. We discuss the features and limitations of these technologies, as well as how these factors influence the utility of these tools in basic research and therapies.The discovery of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) 5 seven years ago has reignited the enthusiasm for cell-based therapy. The ability of iPSCs to undergo unlimited division while maintaining genomic integrity provides a way to overcome the senescence barrier of aged somatic cells. The capacity of iPSCs to differentiate into cells of the three germ layers has been extensively documented in the field. Taken together, it is not hard to appreciate why human iPSC (hiPSC)-based autologous transplantation is heralded as the future of regenerative medicine (Fig. 1). One area that has drawn great interest is correction of genetic diseases in patient-specific hiPSCs with a prospect of personalized cell therapy.Pluripotent stem cells are especially amenable for genome editing because they can undergo extensive tissue culture manipulations, such as drug selection and clonal expansion, while still maintaining their pluripotency and genome stability. Gene targeting in mouse embryonic stem cells by homologous recombination (HR) has proven to be a staple technique for studying gene function (1, 2). However, the same strategy does not translate well into human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) or hiPSCs (3). Although the classical HR method has been successfully used to generate knock-in reporter lines and to correct gene mutations in hESCs, the reported targeting efficiencies are at least several orders of magnitude lower than what is achievable in mouse embryonic stem cells (4,5). This is likely due to the intrinsic differences in the DNA repair process between humans and mice, as measures to improve single-cell survival and DNA transfection did not have a dramatic effect on gene targeting efficiency (6, 7). However, other methods aimed at promoting HR proved more fruitful (3). In the past several years, there has been a spike of interest in genome editing in hESCs and hiPSCs, possibly due to the potential of this technology in modeling and correcting a myriad of genetic diseases (8,9). This has fueled a rapid development in novel technologies for targeted modification of the human genome. Here, we aim to provide a timely u...