2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editor's Choice – Direct vs. Indirect Angiosomal Revascularisation of Infrapopliteal Arteries, an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract: DR of the tibial vessels appears to result in improved wound healing and limb salvage rates compared with IR, with no effect on mortality or re-intervention rates. For surgical revascularisation the importance of DR appears to be lost for wound healing. When possible, these low quality data suggests DR should be undertaken in preference to IR.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of meta-analyses suggest that, when feasible, DR of the foot angiosome affected by ischemic tissue lesions may improve wound healing and limb salvage rates compared with IR. [7][8][9][10]12 However, most authors suggest a cautious interpretation because "the quality of evidence on which these conclusions are based on is low," and further studies of better quality are needed to confirm these results.…”
Section: Is It Possible To Pursue An Angiosome-guided Revascularizatimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of meta-analyses suggest that, when feasible, DR of the foot angiosome affected by ischemic tissue lesions may improve wound healing and limb salvage rates compared with IR. [7][8][9][10]12 However, most authors suggest a cautious interpretation because "the quality of evidence on which these conclusions are based on is low," and further studies of better quality are needed to confirm these results.…”
Section: Is It Possible To Pursue An Angiosome-guided Revascularizatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 In the last 15 years multiple studies were published supporting the concept that DR, either percutaneous or surgical, leads to improved healing and limb salvage rates in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Subsequent to these numerous reports, the new global vascular guidelines (GVGs) introduce the novel concept of target arterial path that is defined as the optimal arterial pathway to restore in-line (pulsatile) flow to the ankle and foot, and it may incorporate either the least diseased or an angiosome preferred path. 14 In line with this concept of reestablishing a direct line of blood flow to the wound, endovascular treatment of CLTI patients has evolved toward extreme approaches, and below-the-ankle interventions are proposed as a new strategy to improve clinical success of revascularization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nal arterial pattern is a result of the union of vascular channels which were initially homogenous capillary plexuses [11]. During embryological development, the most appropriate channels connecting these two plexuses enlarge, while others retract and disappear [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Congruent observations were also provided by Bunte et al, in a parallel review study focusing on AC applications in CLI [86]. A recent and conspicuous review and meta-analysis made by Dilaver et al gathered an impressive 4146 limbs analysis from 22 selected publications on AC/CLTI treatment strategy [87]. The authors document global superior limb salvage and healing rates for DR versus IR however, with no effects on mortality and re-interventions in these patients [87].…”
Section: Current Literature Review Concerning Dr/wtr Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A recent and conspicuous review and meta-analysis made by Dilaver et al gathered an impressive 4146 limbs analysis from 22 selected publications on AC/CLTI treatment strategy [87]. The authors document global superior limb salvage and healing rates for DR versus IR however, with no effects on mortality and re-interventions in these patients [87]. Specific WTR applications in diabetic patients.…”
Section: Current Literature Review Concerning Dr/wtr Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%