2015
DOI: 10.1177/2048872615585519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editor’s Choice-Is the pre-hospital ECG after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest accurate for the diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction?

Abstract: The pre-hospital ROSC-ECG is a suboptimal diagnostic tool to predict STEMI and therefore not a sensitive tool for triage to cardiac centres. This supports the incentive of referring all comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of suspected cardiac origin to a tertiary heart centre with the availability of acute coronary angiography, even in the absence of STEs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
8
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3,4 One factor contributing to the varied range in the incidence of CS after STEMI is the prevalence of OHCA, as electrocardiographic changes immediately after resuscitation are difficult to interpret for diagnosing STEMI. 21 This study suggests that the prevalence of OHCA in AMICS is increasing and is in agreement with the recent CULPRIT-SHOCK trial where > 50% of patients had sustained cardiac arrest before randomisation. 10,22 We observed that patients with AMICS and OHCA undergoing revascularization had lower 30-day mortality than patients without OHCA (6% absolute reduction in mortality).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3,4 One factor contributing to the varied range in the incidence of CS after STEMI is the prevalence of OHCA, as electrocardiographic changes immediately after resuscitation are difficult to interpret for diagnosing STEMI. 21 This study suggests that the prevalence of OHCA in AMICS is increasing and is in agreement with the recent CULPRIT-SHOCK trial where > 50% of patients had sustained cardiac arrest before randomisation. 10,22 We observed that patients with AMICS and OHCA undergoing revascularization had lower 30-day mortality than patients without OHCA (6% absolute reduction in mortality).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The incidence of CS in patients with STEMI varies in the literature as studies show both increasing and declining trends over time, but is typically reported to range between 5% and 10% . One factor contributing to the varied range in the incidence of CS after STEMI is the prevalence of OHCA, as electrocardiographic changes immediately after resuscitation are difficult to interpret for diagnosing STEMI . This study suggests that the prevalence of OHCA in AMICS is increasing and is in agreement with the recent CULPRIT‐SHOCK trial where > 50% of patients had sustained cardiac arrest before randomisation .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The issue is further complicated by difficulties interpreting symptoms as well as the ECG in the post cardiac arrest setting since the post resuscitation ECG seem to be a poor predictor of an acute coronary occlusion [8,9]. No randomized trials have evaluated the potential benefit of immediate coronary angiography in patients without STEMI and register studies have shown diverging results [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the cause of cardiac arrest is ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI), immediate coronary angiography (CAG) with/without PCI is recommended. Even for non-STEMI that induces cardiac arrest, CAG with/ without PCI is recommended, because prehospital electrocardiography does not identify an occluded coronary artery [38], and a previous study found that 25% of patients with non-STEMI had an occluded coronary artery [39]. Although Lemkes et al [40] recently reported that a strategy involving immediate CAG was not found to be better than delayed CAG for PCAS patients who had no signs of STEMI, the relatively lower severity of the patients included was pointed out as a research limitation [41].…”
Section: Treatment For Myocardial Dysfunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%