2013
DOI: 10.1057/pcs.2013.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editor’s introduction to special section on the psychosocial effects of neoliberalism

Abstract: After a brief description of neoliberalism, this introduction contends that the articles in the special section on the psychosocial effects of neoliberalism contribute novel ways of thinking about (1) how neoliberalism is lived among different populations; (2) what kinds of fantasies and psychic damage neoliberal policies promote; and (3) what conscious and unconscious forms of collusion and resistance accompany its emergence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, a genre of narratives that normalizes and valorizes reflexive individual agency runs aground on transitions that it cannot easily render coherent for the individual (e.g., death, loss and other experiences of contingent vulnerability). Faced with the threats posed to constituted identities by such transitions, ideals of individual autonomy may, in fact, encourage defensive emotional reactions, including (for example) the narrated disavowal of vulnerability (Layton 2014). Dealing with such clashes between culturally dominant narrative forms and problematic experiences of contingency is, however, a key part of what anthropologists have identified as the social function of a specific genre of narratives, which provide shared resources for negotiating and making sense of ''liminal'' transitions in which individual identities-but also the symbolic order itself-face disruption.…”
Section: Sensemaking Narrative and Liminalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, a genre of narratives that normalizes and valorizes reflexive individual agency runs aground on transitions that it cannot easily render coherent for the individual (e.g., death, loss and other experiences of contingent vulnerability). Faced with the threats posed to constituted identities by such transitions, ideals of individual autonomy may, in fact, encourage defensive emotional reactions, including (for example) the narrated disavowal of vulnerability (Layton 2014). Dealing with such clashes between culturally dominant narrative forms and problematic experiences of contingency is, however, a key part of what anthropologists have identified as the social function of a specific genre of narratives, which provide shared resources for negotiating and making sense of ''liminal'' transitions in which individual identities-but also the symbolic order itself-face disruption.…”
Section: Sensemaking Narrative and Liminalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We must also shift the focus away from intra-individual factors to explain the etiology of emotional distress. There is a great need to develop policies and practices that counter the disconnect between the psychic and the social—a disconnect that neoliberalism reinforces (Layton, 2010, 2014a, 2014b, 2018). Thus, we agree with Rose (2009) that the central question to which we must respond is an ethical one.…”
Section: Conclusion: “Taming the Pharmakon”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this vantage point, peoples’ needs are best met through the marketplace rather than through engagement in political life, for “markets constitute the greatest information processor known to mankind [ sic ] and never mislead participants about the truth” (Mirowski, 2015b, p.11). This point—that the market is not simply an “allocator of scarce resources” (Mirowski, 2017b, p. 6), but is in effect an epistemological machine that produces new modes of subjectivity (see also Layton, 2010, 2014a, 2014b)—will be central to our article.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, the journal's pages have hosted an array of Lacanian, Kleinian, and relational theorists whose analyses of neoliberal versions of collective and individual subjectivity have charted the costs of neoliberalism for public life and private wellbeing, as well as clearly suggesting some of the psychic barriers to progressive social change (see, for example, our two special sections on the psychosocial effects of neoliberalism, Layton, 2014aLayton, , 2014b.…”
Section: Pcs and The Political Momentmentioning
confidence: 99%