2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3726-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: Basic Science, Applied Science, and Product Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also think about evidence quality as a structural problem: What kinds of studies deserve readers' attention more than others, and which sorts of studies need tougher scrutiny. Last year, we identified some characteristics of certain laboratory studies that set them apart as ''product testing,'' explained why the evidence mustered in studies of this design generally is not compelling, and indicated that our enthusiasm for publishing this kind of work is low [2]. This month in CORR 1 , we say goodbye to a genre of clinical research-the case report-likewise because the Editorial Board concurs that this study design no longer meets our readers' needs for high-quality evidence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also think about evidence quality as a structural problem: What kinds of studies deserve readers' attention more than others, and which sorts of studies need tougher scrutiny. Last year, we identified some characteristics of certain laboratory studies that set them apart as ''product testing,'' explained why the evidence mustered in studies of this design generally is not compelling, and indicated that our enthusiasm for publishing this kind of work is low [2]. This month in CORR 1 , we say goodbye to a genre of clinical research-the case report-likewise because the Editorial Board concurs that this study design no longer meets our readers' needs for high-quality evidence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%