2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.12.181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial Commentary: Autograft Beats Allograft for Most Knee Ligament Surgery

Abstract: Knee ligament reconstruction can be performed with autograft or allograft. The use of an autograft has been shown to improve outcomes in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for young, active patients, and also in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. A systematic review of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction showed no difference in outcomes between autograft and allograft tissue. There is a paucity of data comparing autograft versus allograft for fibular collateral li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The elongation of the human dermal allograft may cause increased superior translation of the humeral head and abrasion of the graft under the acromion, resulting in pain or graft failure. Although allograft has advantages, such as no donor site morbidity and reduced operative time, it also has disadvantages with increased cost and higher failure rates [21, 46]. Furthermore, the graft healing rate did not seem as satisfactory as that in SCR using an autograft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elongation of the human dermal allograft may cause increased superior translation of the humeral head and abrasion of the graft under the acromion, resulting in pain or graft failure. Although allograft has advantages, such as no donor site morbidity and reduced operative time, it also has disadvantages with increased cost and higher failure rates [21, 46]. Furthermore, the graft healing rate did not seem as satisfactory as that in SCR using an autograft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although autograft use is linked to improved outcomes in primary and revision ACL reconstruction among younger, more active cohorts, 40 little to no difference in clinical outcomes has been found for ACL and PCL reconstruction with allograft versus autograft in the adult population overall. 41 , 42 Data comparing the use of autograft and allograft for reconstruction of other extra-articular knee structures such as the LCL and PLC are relatively sparse 43 ; thus, it remains unclear whether autograft and allograft perform differently when used to reconstruct the cruciate versus the collateral ligaments. Despite this, our sample reported high levels of satisfaction after receiving allograft reconstruction for MLKI, suggesting that this is a viable treatment option for patients aged 40 years and older.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of PCLR techniques have been described using autograft versus allograft, 16 , 41 single versus double bundle, 31 and open inlay versus arthroscopic transtibial. 27 Although data directly comparing each of these techniques are sparse, reported clinical outcomes have demonstrated no significant differences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%