2023
DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1186029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: Educational robotics as a tool to foster 21st century skills

Abstract: Educational robotics as a tool to foster st century skills. Front. Educ. :. doi: .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings support the claim that educational robots are more effective than conventional methods for facilitating learning because they engage students in the learning process, concretize the subjects, and spark their interest, attention, and motivation (Witherspoon, Schunn, Higashi, & Shoop, 2018). Additionally, students' dexterity improved, and the course was made more engaging by permitting the use of rich and readily available material, so the students were able to learn while having fun, which increased their learning (Lopez-Caudana et al, 2020;Negrini et al, 2023). However, other studies, such as Çakır, Korkmaz, İdil, and Erdoğmuş (2021) and Talan (2021) suggest that the engineering and mathematical skills of educational robots have not significantly improved, or have not significantly differed from other studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings support the claim that educational robots are more effective than conventional methods for facilitating learning because they engage students in the learning process, concretize the subjects, and spark their interest, attention, and motivation (Witherspoon, Schunn, Higashi, & Shoop, 2018). Additionally, students' dexterity improved, and the course was made more engaging by permitting the use of rich and readily available material, so the students were able to learn while having fun, which increased their learning (Lopez-Caudana et al, 2020;Negrini et al, 2023). However, other studies, such as Çakır, Korkmaz, İdil, and Erdoğmuş (2021) and Talan (2021) suggest that the engineering and mathematical skills of educational robots have not significantly improved, or have not significantly differed from other studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Since educational robotics adds diversity to the classroom and keep students engaged and motivated, its integration and use in the teaching and learning process at preschool, primary, and secondary levels can be beneficial and a turning point in the evolution of the educational process (Lopez-Caudana, Ramírez-Montoya, Martínez-Pérez, & Rodríguez-Abitia, 2020). In addition, it can be used as a tool to enhance knowledge building and enhance learners' skills in several aspects, such as creativity, communication, collaboration, critical thinking, teamwork, problem solving, and computational thinking (Negrini et al, 2023).…”
Section: Educational Robots In Teaching and Learning Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Williams et al (2010) indicated that learning with robotics improved students' learning as well as 21 st -century skills such as critical and creative thinking, decision-making, collaboration, and research skills. Their results were confirmed by many other studies (Benitti, 2012;Negrini & Giang, 2019). Leonard et al (2016) integrated robotics and games in a project-based platform to develop CT skills in middle school students.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This prompts reflection on the quality of these training programs and may call for their redesign, with a focus on the fundamental principles of STEM education rather than merely presenting activities with educational robotics kits. The successful integration of educational robotics into STEM fields is crucial for students to benefit from the capabilities that modern education can offer them (Mwangi et al, 2022;Negrini et al, 2023;Papanikolaou et al, 2021;Wang et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%