2010
DOI: 10.1100/tsw.2010.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: Evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong: Are the Findings Replicable Across Different Populations?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The available evaluation findings consistently provide strong evidence that the Project P.A.T.H.S. has a beneficial influence on students [ 6 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The available evaluation findings consistently provide strong evidence that the Project P.A.T.H.S. has a beneficial influence on students [ 6 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[1921]. Generally speaking, triangulated evaluation findings show that different stakeholders (students, teachers, and social workers) hold positive views toward the program and regard the program as beneficial to the development of participants.…”
Section: New Curriculum In the Extension Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adopting the principle of triangulation, different evaluation strategies, including objective outcome evaluation, subjective outcome evaluation, process evaluation, qualitative evaluation, and evaluation based on personal construct psychology have been carried out to examine the effectiveness of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S. [ 19 21 ]. Generally speaking, triangulated evaluation findings show that different stakeholders (students, teachers, and social workers) hold positive views toward the program and regard the program as beneficial to the development of participants.…”
Section: New Curriculum In the Extension Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students learn competencies with reference to the 15 positive youth development constructs as identified in the successful programs by Catalano et al [4]. Based on different evaluation strategies, including objective outcome evaluation, subjective outcome evaluation, process evaluation, qualitative evaluation, and interim evaluation, there is evidence supporting the effectiveness of the Tier 1 Program [57]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%