2017
DOI: 10.1111/ilr.12083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial Farewell

Abstract: With the close of this 2017 volume I will be stepping down as Managing Editor of the International Labour Review. After 11 years in that capacity and over 25 years on the editorial team, it is not easy to let go. But thanks to you, our readers and contributors, the success of the journal's 2007 "relaunch" has given me more than enough of a reward to remember when I look back. On behalf of the entire editorial team, I would like to express our sincere gratitude to you for your interest and support -and to our p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data itself is not entirely adequate (Hirway & Jose, 2011), nor does it help in understanding women's subjective decision‐making: why women enter a job, how their aspirations are formed, or what the underlying mechanisms are. Given the paucity of qualitative studies, some studies have tried to infer women's subjective decision‐making from quantitative data (Lansky et al., 2017). This study, by using qualitative methods, informs questions of the “why” and “how” of women's work outcomes, moving beyond the “what” that quantitative studies have offered.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data itself is not entirely adequate (Hirway & Jose, 2011), nor does it help in understanding women's subjective decision‐making: why women enter a job, how their aspirations are formed, or what the underlying mechanisms are. Given the paucity of qualitative studies, some studies have tried to infer women's subjective decision‐making from quantitative data (Lansky et al., 2017). This study, by using qualitative methods, informs questions of the “why” and “how” of women's work outcomes, moving beyond the “what” that quantitative studies have offered.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%