2015
DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2015.00142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: Hierarchical Object Representations in the Visual Cortex and Computer Vision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, convolutional neural network architectures are the primary choice for most of the computer vision tasks. CNN takes inspiration in biological processes in that the connectivity pattern between neurons corresponds to the organization of the animal visual cortex (Hubel and Wiesel, 1968 ; Fukushima, 1980 ; Rodŕıguez-Sánchez et al, 2015 ). Similarly, as in the eye, individual neurons respond to stimuli from a restricted (bounded by the filter size) region of the visual field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, convolutional neural network architectures are the primary choice for most of the computer vision tasks. CNN takes inspiration in biological processes in that the connectivity pattern between neurons corresponds to the organization of the animal visual cortex (Hubel and Wiesel, 1968 ; Fukushima, 1980 ; Rodŕıguez-Sánchez et al, 2015 ). Similarly, as in the eye, individual neurons respond to stimuli from a restricted (bounded by the filter size) region of the visual field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just noticeable differences (JNDs) were obtained in each condition by fitting a cumulative Gaussian separately to each observer's data (proportion of 'right first' or 'bottom first' responses as a function of target SOA) using a Levenburg-Marquardt algorithm maximum likelihood fitting procedure and multiplying the fitted standard deviation of this fit by 0.6745 (Cass & Van der Burg, 2014;Rodríguez-Sánchez, Fallah, & Leonardis, 2016). The cumulative offset parameter (equivalent to the point of subjective simultaneity; PSS) was free to vary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brief background on 2D convolution. We do not explain the background of 2D convolution operation [33] in detail. Formally speaking, if X ∈ R 𝑀×𝑃 represents an input data matrix, and if W (l) ∈ R 𝑘 𝑙 ×𝑘 𝑙 (𝑘 𝑙 mod 2 = 1, i.e., 𝑘 𝑙 an odd number) denotes the kernel weight matrix of the 𝑙 th layer, conveniently represented as (𝑊 (𝑙) − ⌊𝑘/2⌋ , .…”
Section: Layered Convolutions For Qppmentioning
confidence: 99%