“…The configurational perspective explores the internal dynamics of the HRM system, and analyses how the different elements can be combined synergistically in different management patterns that represent diverse orientations to HRM (Arthur, 1992;Delery, 1998;Delery and Shaw, 2001;Lepak and Snell, 1999;MacDuffie, 1995;Miles and Snow, 1984;Snell and Dean, 1992;Wright and Snell, 1998). Finally, the contextual perspective reconsiders the importance of the context, not only as a contingent variable, but also as a framework for HRM decisions that are influenced by and influence the environment in which they are embedded (Brewster, 1993(Brewster, , 1995(Brewster, , 1999Brewster and Bournois, 1991;Brewster and Lockhart, 1992;Pettigrew, 1986, 1992;Muller, 1999;Paauwe, 1991;Poole, 1990;Sparrow and Hiltrop, 1994). This fourth way of theorizing has provided interesting arguments to explain the international dimension of HRM, especially about how cultural, social and political influences vary across the different contexts in which international firms operate .…”