2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3927-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: Indications - On the Fringes and in the Mainstream

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Complications are common in cosmetic bone lengthening procedures, and they can be severe [3]. As previously suggested [2,4], longterm studies on cosmetic limb lengthening evaluating limb function and patient gains, including psychological validated outcome measurements, are warranted.…”
Section: Where Do We Need To Go?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Complications are common in cosmetic bone lengthening procedures, and they can be severe [3]. As previously suggested [2,4], longterm studies on cosmetic limb lengthening evaluating limb function and patient gains, including psychological validated outcome measurements, are warranted.…”
Section: Where Do We Need To Go?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Critics of stature lengthening have questioned the legitimacy of medicalising height in the absence of other skeletal abnormalities. 2 The standardisation of height as an objective approach cannot escape the subjective factors rooted in cultural and ethnic differences. For example, what is labeled as “normal” distribution in height in Northern European populations certainly does not apply to other populations.…”
Section: E Thical C Onsiderationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical limb lengthening, performed by distraction osteogenesis, has been used to address skeletal deformities and limb-length discrepancies caused by congenital abnormalities, trauma, tumor, and infections. 1 , 2 However, its potential to cosmetically increase height in an otherwise physically healthy patient has stirred controversy within the orthopedic community. We believe that the key to the controversy is the perception of stature lengthening as either a treatment or an enhancement , as the former implies the presence of pathology while the latter does not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment of idiopathic short stature (at least two standard deviations less than the mean height for the age, sex, and population) remains controversial 103,104 . Although such children can gain about 5 cm (2 inches) of adult height following exogenous growth hormone administration, long-term effects of this treatment are unknown 103 .…”
Section: Stature Lengtheningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the lack of evidence-based guidelines and the emerging popularity of internal limb-lengthening implants, the indications for stature lengthening are debatable. Studies evaluating the effect of limb lengthening on the physical and psychosocial health of individuals undergoing stature lengthening are strongly encouraged 104,[109][110][111] .…”
Section: Stature Lengtheningmentioning
confidence: 99%