2022
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.828632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: Innovative Strategies From Synthetic Biology and Bacterial Pathways to Master Biochemical Environmental Challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The term Anthropocene (Wodak, 2020) is used in the current philosophical literature (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2018) with reference to the current geological age, seen as the period in which human activity was the dominant influence on climate and the environment. By analogy, synthetic biology is considered by us as a marker of the Anthropocene, because it extends the dominant influence of humans on the biological in its deepest sense, to the level of the constituent elements of living things -cells and genes -that it reconstructs in shapes and varieties designed by the researchers who make them (Eisenhaber et al, 2022). Their need and continuity with existing biodiversity is questionable -both ontologically and ethically.…”
Section: I1 Synthetic Biology As a Spiritual Marker Of The Anthropocenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term Anthropocene (Wodak, 2020) is used in the current philosophical literature (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2018) with reference to the current geological age, seen as the period in which human activity was the dominant influence on climate and the environment. By analogy, synthetic biology is considered by us as a marker of the Anthropocene, because it extends the dominant influence of humans on the biological in its deepest sense, to the level of the constituent elements of living things -cells and genes -that it reconstructs in shapes and varieties designed by the researchers who make them (Eisenhaber et al, 2022). Their need and continuity with existing biodiversity is questionable -both ontologically and ethically.…”
Section: I1 Synthetic Biology As a Spiritual Marker Of The Anthropocenementioning
confidence: 99%