2013
DOI: 10.1186/2229-0443-3-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: language testing in the Philippines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This potential points to one aspect of creative space in teaching which can be harnessed to address top-down curricular practices: to engage experienced teachers more seriously in promoting learner autonomy and in training younger ones in teaching divergent thinking. Plata's (2013) work expands the trajectory in understanding and unpacking the nature of teacher autonomy in the Philippines. Tracing different levels of participation in developing outcomes and activities for aligning the curricula to the goals of a university, Plata shows that even when decision-making operates at an institutional level, nuances in interpretation and practice of different stakeholders reveal layers of involvement that may either promote or limit the autonomy of teachers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This potential points to one aspect of creative space in teaching which can be harnessed to address top-down curricular practices: to engage experienced teachers more seriously in promoting learner autonomy and in training younger ones in teaching divergent thinking. Plata's (2013) work expands the trajectory in understanding and unpacking the nature of teacher autonomy in the Philippines. Tracing different levels of participation in developing outcomes and activities for aligning the curricula to the goals of a university, Plata shows that even when decision-making operates at an institutional level, nuances in interpretation and practice of different stakeholders reveal layers of involvement that may either promote or limit the autonomy of teachers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%