2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4223-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: Large Database Studies—What They Can Do, What They Cannot Do, and Which Ones We Will Publish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Presently, there are not enough data in the literature to assess the accuracy of coding in NIS for uncommon complications such as ION and RAO. 27 Both over- and under-coding are possible. Also, it is not possible to rule out if changes in coding frequency of ION or of the spinal fusion procedure codes are involved in the incidence data results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, there are not enough data in the literature to assess the accuracy of coding in NIS for uncommon complications such as ION and RAO. 27 Both over- and under-coding are possible. Also, it is not possible to rule out if changes in coding frequency of ION or of the spinal fusion procedure codes are involved in the incidence data results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, separating clinically and statistically significant differences may limit the number of differences seen within the cohorts evaluated herein, but concomitantly, it, most likely, led to decrease in type 1 errors that could be made based on such a large sample size. 15…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has a focus more geared to oncology than to general orthopaedics. It is particularly suited to assess early quality measures [3]. Complications such as fracture, neuropathy, thromboembolic complications, among others, and oncologic outcome will be accessible to participating centers with approved research questions.…”
Section: How Do We Get There?mentioning
confidence: 99%