2011
DOI: 10.3750/aip2011.41.4.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial Note on Weight–Length Relations of Fishes

Abstract: The weight (W) of fishes (and other organisms) is exponentially related to their length (L) according to the equation W = aL b , where a is the intercept and b is the slope of the log-transformed relation (Le Cren 1951, Froese 2006. Based on the slope (b) of the relation between weight and length, one can check whether the growth of a fish species is isometric (b = 3, all fish dimensions increase at the same rate), hypoallometric (b < 3, a fish increases less in weight than predicted by its increase in length,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
386
2
11

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 420 publications
(411 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
12
386
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…We consider results presented in this report an adequate estimation of L-W relation for the eleven species, because the parameter b fell within the expected range of 2.6-3.4 (Froese et al 2011), and the threshold of a minimum number of sampled fishes (100 specimens for each species) was also reached (Froese 2006, Froese et al 2011.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We consider results presented in this report an adequate estimation of L-W relation for the eleven species, because the parameter b fell within the expected range of 2.6-3.4 (Froese et al 2011), and the threshold of a minimum number of sampled fishes (100 specimens for each species) was also reached (Froese 2006, Froese et al 2011.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to regression analysis, log-log plots of the length-weight pairs were performed to identify outliers (Froese et al 2011). Extreme outliers were excluded from the analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Froese et al (2011) an adequate sample size of about 100 specimens per species, i.e., there is no need to kill thousands of specimens only for WLR estimates with exception of rare and endangered species as well as specimens that were caught from opportunity sampling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relation to growth stanzas between size class, O. xinguense presents a growth type which apparently follows the morphological pattern adopted by Jégu (1992), juveniles (up to 10 cm SL) have positive allometric growth (b = 3.117), while the adults have negative allometric growth (b = 2.716). Nevertheless, the LWR provided to juveniles, although significant (t-test, P < 0.05) and with high correlation (R 2 = 0.99), should be observed with caution due to the low sample size (N = 19), far from the minimum of 100 specimens recommended by Froese et al (2011). Taking into account the condition factor (K), the females of O. xinguense display K value higher than males.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%