Editorial: Post-pandemic digital realities of older adults

Marston, Hannah R.; Ivan, Loredana; Rosenberg, Dennis; Ratzenboeck, Barbara

doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1275257

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This was supported by evidence reporting variable uptake and declining use of wireless physical activity monitors (WPAMs) among adults living with HIV engaged in a community-based exercise intervention (21) and barriers and facilitators to uptake of WPAMs in the context of HIV (40). Similarly, the priorities from this Forum are supported by variability in digital health literacy documented among older adult populations during the COVID-19 pandemic (41,42). Stakeholders also highlighted the limitations of technology, balancing online and in-person approaches, and taking individualized approaches for weaving digital health technology into rehabilitation HIV care.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

Research priorities in HIV, aging and rehabilitation: Building on a Framework with the Canada-International HIV and Rehabilitation Research Collaborative

O’Brien,

Ibáñez-Carrasco,

Birtwell

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background In 2016, the Canada-International HIV and Rehabilitation Research Collaborative established a framework of research priorities in HIV, aging and rehabilitation. Our aim was to review and identify any new emerging priorities from the perspectives of people living with HIV, clinicians, researchers, and representatives from community organizations. Methods We conducted a multi-stakeholder international consultation with people living with HIV, researchers, clinicians and representatives of community-based organizations. Stakeholders convened for a one-day Forum in Manchester, United Kingdom (UK) to discuss research priorities via a web-based questionnaire and facilitated discussions. We analyzed data using conventional content analytical techniques and mapped emerging priorities onto the foundational framework. Results Thirty-five stakeholders from the UK(n = 29), Canada(n = 5) and Ireland(n = 1) attended the Forum, representing persons living with HIV or representatives from community-based organizations(n = 12;34%), researchers or academics(n = 10;28%), service providers(n = 6;17%), clinicians(n = 4;11%); and trainees(n = 4;11%). Five priorities mapped onto the Framework of Research Priorities across three content areas: A–Episodic Health and Disability Aging with HIV (disability, frailty, social participation), B-Rehabilitation Interventions for Healthy Aging across the Lifespan (role, implementation and impact of digital and web-based rehabilitation interventions) and C–Outcome Measurement in HIV and Aging (digital and web-based rehabilitation health technology to measure physical activity). Stakeholders indicated methodological considerations for implementing digital and web-based rehabilitation interventions into research and practice and the importance of knowledge transfer and exchange among the broader community. Conclusion Results highlight the sustained importance of the framework of research priorities and provide further depth and areas of inquiry related to digital and web-based rehabilitation interventions and technology aging with HIV.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

Research priorities in HIV, aging and rehabilitation: Building on a Framework with the Canada-International HIV and Rehabilitation Research Collaborative

O’Brien,

Ibáñez-Carrasco,

Birtwell

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This was supported by evidence reporting variable uptake and declining use of wireless physical activity monitors (WPAMs) among adults living with HIV engaged in a community-based exercise intervention [ 21 ] and barriers and facilitators to uptake of WPAMs in the context of HIV [ 40 ]. Similarly, the priorities from this Forum are supported by variability in digital health literacy documented among older adult populations during the COVID-19 pandemic [ 41 , 42 ]. Stakeholders also highlighted the limitations of technology, balancing online and in-person approaches, and taking individualized approaches for weaving digital health technology into rehabilitation HIV care.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research priorities in HIV, aging and rehabilitation: building on a framework with the Canada-International HIV and Rehabilitation Research Collaborative

O’Brien,

Ibáñez-Carrasco,

Birtwell

et al. 2023

AIDS Res Ther

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background In 2016, the Canada-International HIV and Rehabilitation Research Collaborative established a framework of research priorities in HIV, aging and rehabilitation. Our aim was to review and identify any new emerging priorities from the perspectives of people living with HIV, clinicians, researchers, and representatives from community organizations. Methods We conducted a multi-stakeholder international consultation with people living with HIV, researchers, clinicians and representatives of community-based organizations. Stakeholders convened for a one-day Forum in Manchester, United Kingdom (UK) to discuss research priorities via a web-based questionnaire and facilitated discussions. We analyzed data using conventional content analytical techniques and mapped emerging priorities onto the foundational framework. Results Thirty-five stakeholders from the UK(n = 29), Canada(n = 5) and Ireland(n = 1) attended the Forum, representing persons living with HIV or representatives from community-based organizations(n = 12;34%), researchers or academics(n = 10;28%), service providers(n = 6;17%), clinicians(n = 4;11%); and trainees(n = 4;11%). Five priorities mapped onto the Framework of Research Priorities across three content areas: A–Episodic Health and Disability Aging with HIV (disability, frailty, social participation), B-Rehabilitation Interventions for Healthy Aging across the Lifespan (role, implementation and impact of digital and web-based rehabilitation interventions) and C–Outcome Measurement in HIV and Aging (digital and web-based rehabilitation health technology to measure physical activity). Stakeholders indicated methodological considerations for implementing digital and web-based rehabilitation interventions into research and practice and the importance of knowledge transfer and exchange among the broader community. Conclusion Results highlight the sustained importance of the Framework of Research Priorities and provide further depth and areas of inquiry related to digital and web-based rehabilitation interventions and technology aging with HIV.

show abstract

Editorial: Post-pandemic digital realities of older adults

Cited by 2 publications

References 31 publications

Research priorities in HIV, aging and rehabilitation: Building on a Framework with the Canada-International HIV and Rehabilitation Research Collaborative

Research priorities in HIV, aging and rehabilitation: Building on a Framework with the Canada-International HIV and Rehabilitation Research Collaborative

Research priorities in HIV, aging and rehabilitation: building on a framework with the Canada-International HIV and Rehabilitation Research Collaborative

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About